In March, OpenAI’s GPT-5.4 achieved a new state-of-the-art, matching or exceeding industry professionals in 83.0% of comparisons on GDPval, a benchmark spanning 44 occupations. In February, Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 signaled a similar advance, pairing that performance with stronger coding, better debugging, and longer task execution for agents. This progress has changed the enterprise conversation because AI is now doing much more than generating answers. It’s at a point where it can complete meaningful pieces of work.
In sharp contrast, the previous two years were defined by hesitation across the C-Suite. In early 2024, IBM found that 42% of enterprise-scale companies had actively deployed AI, while another 40% were still exploring or experimenting. In 2025, IBM reported that only 25% of AI initiatives had delivered expected ROI and only 16% had scaled enterprise-wide. McKinsey’s 2025 survey showed the same pattern at a broader level: nearly nine in ten organizations were using AI in at least one function, yet most remained in piloting or early scaling, and only 39% reported any business impact. The mood across 2024 and 2025 was distinctly shaped by curiosity and pilot activity with persistent questions about payoff.
From pilots to production
Against that backdrop, 2026 has ushered in a new era of workflow accuracy with strong gains in places where enterprises can see immediate value: spreadsheets, document-heavy analysis and software development. For example, OpenAI’s GPT-5.4 released in March 2026 is 33% less likely to be false than GPT-5.2 on a set of real-world prompts. Anthropic positioned Opus 4.6 as a model that plans more carefully and sustains longer-running work. At the same time, Deloitte reported that workforce access to sanctioned AI tools had risen from fewer than 40% to around 60% in one year, and that 85% of companies expect to customize autonomous agents for their own businesses.
Markets have picked up the implications quickly. By the first week of February, stocks had lost about $1 trillion in market value as investors worried that fast-advancing AI tools could upend the sector. Part of the shock came from how directly the new systems were moving into core business workflows. Reuters reported that Anthropic launched plug-ins for legal, sales, marketing and data-analysis tasks, then added more plug-ins for investment banking, wealth management, HR, private equity, engineering and design. OpenAI, meanwhile, formed an alliance with BCG, McKinsey, Accenture and Capgemini to give AI pilots greater legitimacy and a clearer path to scale through consulting firms that enterprises already trust to guide major transformation efforts. Investors were reacting to a simple idea: software was beginning to perform work that had once lived inside teams and SaaS products.
The CIO becomes steward of digital labor
As AI takes on more structured cognitive work, enterprises gain a new layer of digital labor. Someone must decide where that labor fits, how it connects to core systems and data, how its output is measured, where human oversight remains essential and how risk and accountability are managed. Those responsibilities sit naturally with the CIO because they span the very domains the role already oversees: enterprise platforms, security, governance, integration, operating workflows and the architecture that links technology to business execution. The CIO is also one of the few leaders with visibility across functions, which makes the role especially well-suited to determining where digital labor can scale, where it needs guardrails and how it should reshape the way work gets done. The mandate now extends beyond running systems. It includes stewarding systems that increasingly execute work.
This pushes the CIO deeper into business strategy. Now that AI is accurate enough to redesign workflows, the challenge has become operational, economic and organizational. Which tasks should move to agents first? Where does human judgment create the most value? Which functions benefit most from faster analysis and machine-assisted execution? The answers shape speed, margins, customer experience and competitive differentiation. In this environment, the CIO becomes one of the executives most responsible for translating technical progress into business-model advantage.
The next source of advantage will come from converting company-specific judgment into executable systems. Frontier models are spreading quickly across the market, which brings up a different question: whose policies, pricing logic, approval paths, customer context and exception rules are being encoded into workflows that agents can execute with confidence? Much of a company’s edge lives inside those decisions. The CIO stands at the center of that conversion because turning institutional know-how into reliable machine action requires data access, process redesign, system integration and governance working together.
As AI access broadens and use becomes routine, the CIO’s role increasingly includes leading cultural change. Teams need training, new operating norms, trusted guardrails and clear accountability for outputs shaped by AI. Roles are beginning to shift toward judgment, exception handling, taste and decision-making. The most effective CIOs will treat this as work redesign rather than a tool rollout. They will build a blended workforce in which people and digital workers are orchestrated together with intention.
Turning AI capability into operating advantage
AI’s promise is growing faster than most enterprises’ ability to capture its value. Yet only 12% of CEOs report higher revenues from AI. Given the CIO’s role as an execution leader, the gap between what the technology can do and what the business realizes is exactly where CIO leadership matters most. The enterprise needs someone who can turn AI from enthusiasm into operating discipline by selecting workflows with measurable upside, embedding governance into deployment, managing vendors and models coherently and proving that digital labor can scale safely inside the business. This is where CIOs can truly shine. The organizations that win this phase will treat AI as a managed workforce layer with standards, accountability and clear ownership.
The next management discipline will look like workforce management fused with managerial accounting. Leading CIOs will track digital labor through business metrics: cost per accepted outcome, cycle-time, error and rework levels, escalation patterns and the share of output that still requires human repair. Those measures show where AI is compounding value and where it is creating hidden friction to find where human oversight continues to carry the greatest economic return. The enterprises that build this measurement layer early will scale AI with evidence, steer investment with far more precision and learn faster than competitors how to allocate work across people and machines.
AI is making the next chapter of IT leadership bigger than infrastructure and more consequential than another round of digital transformation rhetoric. As software begins to perform meaningful work, the CIO becomes the steward of the digital workforce. The role now extends into strategy, growth, talent, culture and operating model design. In 2024 and 2025, enterprises were asking whether AI would ever justify itself. In 2026, the more urgent question is where AI can reshape workflow economics first. CIOs will be the executives who answer it.
This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.
Want to join?
Read More from This Article: Why the CIO is uniquely positioned to lead the digital workforce
Source: News

