Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

Heimdal Survey: Executives Four Times More Confident About AI Risk Than the Teams Managing It

New research from cybersecurity company Heimdal finds 29% of US executives say AI risk is under control, against 7% of the practitioners running it day-to-day. Across 1,000 IT professionals in the UK and US, AI adoption has outpaced security controls by roughly two to one.

Heimdal today published The State of AI Risk Management in 2026, a survey of 1,000 IT professionals across the United Kingdom and the United States.

The report’s headline finding is a divide inside the same organizations: the closer a person sits to the day-to-day running of AI, the less confident they are that the risk is contained. In the US, 29% of C-suite and VP respondents say their organization has AI risk under control, against 7% of the mid-level practitioners managing it.

In the UK, the gap runs the same way, 18% to 11%. Both gaps are statistically significant.

AI tools are already present across most IT estates, and most teams run several at once.

The controls have not kept pace. Across both markets, the report finds adoption has outrun security controls by roughly two to one.

The survey also records a counterintuitive pattern: the teams that see their AI use most clearly are the most concerned about it, not the least.

Heimdal’s report describes visibility as the diagnosis rather than the cure.

In an incident publicly disclosed in January 2026, the acting director of CISA, the United States cybersecurity agency, uploaded documents marked “For Official Use Only” to public ChatGPT in mid-2025.

The agency’s own monitoring flagged the activity within a week, but the use policy had not prevented it.

Key findings

  • Executive confidence outruns the frontline. In the US, 29% of executives say AI risk is under control, against 7% of practitioners. In the UK, 18% against 11%.
  • AI is already embedded. ChatGPT runs in 72% of UK IT environments and 69% of US environments, and Microsoft Copilot in 68% of UK and 59% of US.
  • Readiness lags adoption. Only around 4 in 10 teams rate their security stack as ready for AI-related risk.
  • Concern rises with visibility. Among UK teams with full visibility into AI use, 56% flag data leakage as a top concern, against 27% of teams with none. In the US the figure is 59% among teams with full visibility.
  • Operational load is high. Nearly three-quarters of IT and security teams lose at least a quarter of their week to repetitive, low-value work, and around one in three lose more than half.
  • The most overloaded teams are the most optimistic about AI. 59% of the most overloaded US teams, and 55% in the UK, expect AI to ease the load.

“Misplaced confidence is one of the most dangerous things in security. This data shows executives are far more confident that AI risk is under control than the evidence supports. Most of the conversation right now is about productivity, when the bigger question is how AI can be turned against the business. The report shows the gap between how secure leaders feel and how secure they actually are,” said Adam Pilton, Cybersecurity Advisor at Heimdal.Independent security researcher Rafay Baloch, CEO and Founder of REDSECLABS, added: “The risk that concerns me most is not AI itself but the blind spots it can create. When teams use AI tools without clear oversight, sensitive information, intellectual property, and business data can end up in places leaders never intended. Many organizations believe having an AI policy means they are prepared, but a policy alone does not create visibility. The companies seeing the best results are not the ones trying to restrict AI. They are the ones creating clear guardrails while helping employees use AI responsibly.”

The report concludes that organizations should treat AI as part of the core IT estate, applying the same scrutiny to AI services as to any other critical supplier, including procurement review, contractual data-handling terms, a current inventory of sanctioned and unsanctioned AI tools, and technical controls over access, execution, action chains, and privilege.

The full report is available at https://heimdalsecurity.com/blog/state-ai-risk-management/

About the Research

The State of AI Risk Management in 2026 is based on a survey of 1,000 IT professionals (500 UK, 500 US), conducted via Pollfish from 1 to 8 May 2026. The sample spans six seniority tiers from entry-level through C-suite and VP.

About Heimdal

Heimdal is a global cybersecurity provider offering a unified security and compliance platform across endpoint, identity, email, network, and access security. More than 17,000 customers in over 40 countries use its 12-plus integrated products to prevent threats, detect breaches, and automate response.

Contact

Head of Content

Danny Mitchell

Heimdal

dmi@heimdalsecurity.com


Read More from This Article: Heimdal Survey: Executives Four Times More Confident About AI Risk Than the Teams Managing It
Source: News

Category: NewsJune 17, 2026
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:【第5回】「ヒトとAIの協働とは何か?」を徹底的に考え、実現する――CIOが設計すべき新しい働き方と企業変革NextNext post:From RAG to ontology: Databricks bets on context as the key to trusted AI agents

Related posts

Una mirada al futuro del liderazgo en TI: la visión del CIO Executive
June 19, 2026
Solving an ARD problem in AI: Agentic Resource Discovery
June 19, 2026
Google, Microsoft offer specs to help you prove your AI is behaving nicely
June 19, 2026
OpenAI adds spend controls and usage analytics to ChatGPT Enterprise
June 19, 2026
La carrera por abaratar la IA: así intentan las empresas bajar el coste de los ‘tokens’
June 19, 2026
Gracia Sánchez-Vizcaíno (Securitas): “El CIO que solo gestiona sistemas va a perder relevancia frente al que lidera la transformación del modelo operativo completo”
June 19, 2026
Recent Posts
  • Una mirada al futuro del liderazgo en TI: la visión del CIO Executive
  • Solving an ARD problem in AI: Agentic Resource Discovery
  • Google, Microsoft offer specs to help you prove your AI is behaving nicely
  • OpenAI adds spend controls and usage analytics to ChatGPT Enterprise
  • La carrera por abaratar la IA: así intentan las empresas bajar el coste de los ‘tokens’
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • June 2026
    • May 2026
    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.