Leading when the world is on fire and technology won’t stand still

When I first pitched this article, the world already felt unstable. Technology was accelerating, AI was dominating headlines and most leadership teams were still working out what it all meant. Since then, the temperature has risen again. Geopolitical tensions have escalated, economic pressure is building and political trust continues to fracture. The conditions organizations are operating in are more volatile, more complex and more uncertain than they have been in years.

We have been here before, or at least it feels that way. After the global pandemic, there was a brief moment of optimism. Stability, or the illusion of it, returned. Then came the Ukraine invasion, persistent inflation, rising interest rates and tightening margins. Organizations continued to push for growth while absorbing increasing cost pressure. The global economic levers have been shifting constantly, regionally and internationally, and the sense of control has diminished.

At least during the pandemic, there was a shared sense of purpose. That alignment has now gone. Politics is swinging, global tensions are rising and businesses are dealing with multiple competing pressures at once. Inflation, cost management, employee expectations, customer demand and shareholder returns are all moving simultaneously, often in different directions. Stability is what organizations want most, yet as highlighted in the PwC CEO Survey, leaders are operating in sustained uncertainty rather than moving through a short-term transition.

As for economic stability – we’re simply not getting it.

At the same time, while AI dominates the conversation, cybersecurity remains a constant and growing threat. In many ways, the current conditions favour threat actors. Distraction, reduced budgets and fragmented priorities create opportunity. This is not a new risk, but it is one that continues to evolve alongside everything else.

And right in the centre of all this sits technology. And you sit in the centre of that.

Technology leadership at the center of chaos

There is no other function operating so directly at the intersection of disruption and opportunity as technology. Over recent years, the focus shifted heavily towards cyber resilience. Boards prioritised protection over progression, asking how to avoid risk rather than how to accelerate growth. That focus was necessary, but it changed the tone of technology leadership.

Now AI has entered the equation, adding another layer of complexity. Its rise has been rapid, and the narrative around it is often louder than the reality. While there is genuine value, most organizations are still experimenting rather than scaling. This creates a gap between expectation and execution that technology leaders must manage carefully.

AI is both an existential opportunity and an existential threat.

For CIOs and CTOs, the challenge is not choosing between competing priorities, but operating within all of them at once. The organizations that move decisively in this ambiguity gain advantage, as explored in McKinsey’s work on leading through uncertainty (https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/winning-through-the-turns-how-smart-companies-can-thrive-amid-uncertainty). Technology leaders are expected to navigate uncertainty, translate external volatility into internal decisions and maintain stability within the organization while everything around it shifts. The role has expanded beyond systems and delivery into leadership, judgment, and commercial influence.

Don’t make your own chaos

External instability cannot be controlled. Internal instability can.

Organizations often respond to uncertainty by increasing activity rather than improving clarity. New tools are introduced quickly, particularly in AI. Technology estates become more complex, decision-making slows and alignment weakens. What starts as a response to change can easily become a source of additional disruption.

This is how organizations make a difficult situation worse.

The responsibility of the technology leader is to create clarity. This increasingly means enabling faster, more distributed decision-making, reflecting the shift described in McKinsey’s view of modern operating models. That begins with a strategy that is understood, communicated and adaptable. It should provide direction without being rigid, allowing the organization to respond to change without losing coherence. Flexibility is important, but it must be controlled.

Flexibility is not the same as chaos. Having clear processes, appropriate governance and strong communication channels enables you to adopt and pivot quickly and decisively without chaos.

Technology leaders also need to act as translators and educators. AI is still immature and evolving, and expectations need to be managed carefully. Leaders must help their organizations understand what AI can realistically deliver today, while preparing for what it may enable in the future. This requires honest conversations about capability, impact and timing.

Those conversations are not always comfortable. AI will change roles, processes and structures. Ignoring that reality is not leadership. At the same time, overstating capability creates risk. The balance sits in being informed, deliberate and clear.

A recent conversation with a customer service leader highlighted this tension. Their initial instinct was to protect a large operational team by dismissing AI as a short-term trend. As the discussion progressed, it became clear that AI could significantly improve both customer experience and operational efficiency. The challenge was not whether change would happen, but how it would be led.

Leaders are not there to preserve the current state. They are there to evolve the business.

Technology leaders must also maintain discipline. Investment needs to be controlled, technology sprawl contained and technical debt actively reduced. Without this, organizations risk becoming more complex and less effective over time, particularly as AI adoption accelerates.

If you are not deliberate, you will drift.

The next 12 to 24 months will be critical. Organizations that manage adoption carefully will emerge stronger. Those that do not will face increased complexity, cost and risk.

Cyber, cost and commercial reality

While AI continues to dominate attention, cyber risk remains a constant and growing concern. Boards are also struggling with the pace and complexity of change, often expecting certainty where it no longer exists, a dynamic discussed in Forbes analysis of executive decision-making under pressure. The threat landscape is evolving, and the likelihood of impact remains high.

It is not a question of if, but when.

This does not require panic, but it does require discipline. Many organizations do not need more tools; they need to apply existing controls effectively. Getting the basics right remains one of the most effective ways to improve resilience.

At the same time, the role of the technology leader has become more explicitly commercial. Understanding the cost base in detail is essential. Leaders need clarity on where money is spent, what drives value and where inefficiencies exist. This is no longer a supporting capability; it is a core expectation.

Understanding the business is equally important. Technology leaders must know how value is created, where risks sit and how global factors influence performance. This context shapes better decisions and enables more effective prioritization.

Technical capability alone is no longer enough.

The role now requires commercial awareness, operational discipline and the ability to influence across the organization. Strong relationships, clear communication and consistent visibility are critical to maintaining alignment.

The focus that matters

In an environment of constant change, the core priorities remain consistent. Technology leadership ultimately comes down to three outcomes: driving revenue, growing margin and improving resilience.

Everything else is secondary.

People remain central to delivery, but outcomes define success. Leaders must balance supporting their teams with making decisions that move the business forward. That tension is inherent in the role and requires clarity of focus.

Uncertainty is not new. The pace is.

Business cycles will continue, and the environment will remain unpredictable. The role of the technology leader is not to remove that uncertainty, but to operate effectively within it. Preparation, adaptability and clear decision-making are what differentiate strong organizations from the rest.

Know your costs. Know your business. Build strong relationships. Communicate clearly.

Have a plan. Be ready to change it.

And above all, do not make the situation worse.

This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.
Want to join?