Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

Why Managing Third-party Risk is Essential for Today’s CIO

Any organization that fails to take into consideration supply chain cybersecurity threats is putting itself at great risk. The fact is, a company can be impacted by incidents that emerge from virtually anywhere within the chain. That’s why third-party risk management has become so important.

Managing third-party risk involves identifying and mitigating risks to an organization from external business partners, including suppliers, vendors, service providers, consultants, and contractors. As part of the process, organizations need to understand the risk profile not only of their direct business partners but also of the companies those partners are doing business with.

In many cases, third-party vendors outsource portions of their business to service providers, and each of those companies’ security postures can ultimately have an impact on the organization that’s contracting with the third party. Each additional third-party relationship magnifies an organization’s risk.

Needless to say, third-party risk management can be a challenging undertaking, especially for enterprises with complex supply chains. But it is necessary to implement the safeguards required to reduce or eliminate risk. The stakes are too high to ignore potential threats among business partners. This includes the possibility of business disruption because of a security breach.

For example, many companies have come to rely on outsourced services for payroll, IT infrastructure, web hosting, application development, among many others. If a third-party provider fails to deliver its services because of a disruption of any kind, that can have significant consequences for its clients.

In addition, third-party access to an organization’s physical facilities and IT systems can open it up to an increased level of risk. If the company’s customer data is exposed because of a third-party’s security vulnerability, for instance, the company is still liable for the attack. Industry research has shown that a large percentage of companies have experienced a cybersecurity breach because of weaknesses in their supply chains or third-party vendors.

Managing the risk

As part of managing third-party risk, it is essential that organizations vet all the parties they partner with. This helps them identify and assess the risks third parties create so they can work with them either to control those risks or find more secure alternatives.

In order to assess their third-party associates, organizations need to first take a complete inventory of these companies. Third-party partners might include suppliers and contractors, IT management services, software vendors, cloud service providers, staffing agencies, payroll service providers, fidelity management services, and tax professionals to name a few.

They might include everything from large, global organizations to individual contractors, as well as the companies whose businesses subcontract services to. Needless to say, this can take time, but it’s worth the effort to ensure third-party risk management.

Part of the vetting process also includes identifying and documenting the systems, applications, and data each of the third-party entities can access. Because many of these partners can access and process an organization’s highly sensitive data, it’s vital to ensure they meet proper security standards.

It’s also important to evaluate third parties individually to determine the likelihood and possible results of data breaches and other security incidents, then classify the parties according to the level of risk they pose. That way, security teams can focus their mitigation efforts on the highest-risk parties first.

There is really no limit to the potential security shortfalls partners can have. Third parties might not have an acceptable level of visibility into endpoint devices used by their employees or sufficient access controls to ensure the protection of their systems and networks. That can leave them exposed to a number of security issues.

One way to assess the security posture of business partners is to send each a questionnaire for information gathering around organizational structure and governance, cybersecurity practices in place, networks and other digital assets it needs to access, and security measures it takes when accessing resources.

Based on the security assessment, mitigation might require taking measures such as restricting access to certain assets, calling on the partner to address vulnerabilities, or implementing stronger security controls. If an organization determines that risks can’t be reasonably reduced, it should consider ending the relationship.

Beyond security

Evaluating third-party is not limited to cybersecurity. Organizations also need to ensure that partners are meeting regulatory compliance requirements because a lack of third-party controls can result in data loss and subsequent regulatory fines.

In addition, companies need to ensure that proper operational controls are in place with third parties, because failures can cause businesses to shut down for extended periods.

Third-party failures in any of these areas can result in lost business, financial damage, and a negative impact on the brand and reputation of any company that deals with the business that experienced a breach or disruption.

It’s important to remember that third-party risk management is not a “set it and forget it” proposition. Because third-party behavior and the threat landscape change over time, organizations need to perform regular assessments of their business partners. They can perform monitoring continuously in real-time by deploying tools such as vendor risk-management platforms.

The assessment process needs to be repeated for each new third-party partner an organization hires. By being constantly vigilant, organizations can ensure that the third-party companies they do business with present as little risk as possible.

Third-party risk management takes a lot of effort, but the potential advantages are clear. It leads to greater visibility into relationships with partners, which in turn enables companies to better understand the interconnectivity among supply chain parties and the potential risks.

In addition, due diligence allows executives to make more informed decisions about the organizations they do business with. Risks can be identified and controlled. Third-party risk management can also lead to better regulatory compliance because it’s a requirement of many regulations.

Perhaps most important, managing the risk of third-party relationships will help keep an organization’s IT resources protected against a variety of threats, and its supply chain operating efficiently.

Take control of third-party risk management. Learn how.

Risk Management


Read More from This Article: Why Managing Third-party Risk is Essential for Today’s CIO
Source: News

Category: NewsSeptember 29, 2022
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:With Swiss Precision, Canton of Zurich Launches Lightning Quick Hiring PlatformNextNext post:Why Do I Love AI in the Contact Center? Let Me Count the Ways

Related posts

독일 소버린 AI 대표주자 알레프 알파, 코히어와 손잡고 글로벌 연합 선택
April 29, 2026
Las empresas se están replanteando Kubernetes
April 29, 2026
Enterprises still chase incremental, not transformational, AI gains
April 29, 2026
SAP 2027 deadline for S/4HANA out of reach for most customers
April 29, 2026
Creating an exciting, customer-centric vision
April 29, 2026
AI 코딩 보조에서 개발 파이프라인까지…오픈AI ‘심포니’의 전환 실험
April 29, 2026
Recent Posts
  • 독일 소버린 AI 대표주자 알레프 알파, 코히어와 손잡고 글로벌 연합 선택
  • Las empresas se están replanteando Kubernetes
  • Enterprises still chase incremental, not transformational, AI gains
  • Creating an exciting, customer-centric vision
  • SAP 2027 deadline for S/4HANA out of reach for most customers
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.