Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

SAP users show pragmatism under pressure

SAP users in German-speaking countries will continue to invest in IT and SAP in 2026 — but more selectively and under greater economic pressure, according to a new study, from the German-speaking SAP User Group (DSAG).

DSAG’s Investment Report 2026 found that 38% of the nearly 200 companies surveyed in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland will increase their total IT budget in 2026, with investments in SAP rising by 43 percent. At the same time, however, budgets are falling for around a quarter of those surveyed.

“The budget trends reflect the ongoing economic pressure that many companies are under. Energy prices, geopolitical uncertainties, and a tense market environment are leading to investments being scrutinized more critically, prioritized, and in some cases postponed — including in the SAP environment,” said DSAG CEO Jens Hungershausen.

SAP remains strategically positioned

Even though investments are being made in a more targeted and critical manner, the Walldorf-based company remains relevant for the future orientation of companies. Only 16 percent of participants in the survey stated that the importance of SAP is declining, while for the remaining 84 percent, the ERP giant’s solutions have remained equally relevant (48 percent) or even increased in relevance (36 percent).

The target vision is clearly strategic and less operational, as the top three responses show:

  • Digital transformation/process modernization,
  • cost optimization/efficiency improvement, and
  • Compliance/security.

“The results clearly show that companies no longer view SAP investments in isolation,” explains Hungershausen. “Digital transformation and process modernization remain the key drivers, but they are clearly flanked by the need to operate more efficiently and reliably meet regulatory and security requirements.”

However, numerous challenges influence SAP investment decisions, in particular:

  • the cost-effectiveness of investments in SAP software (79 percent),
  • the economic environment (79 percent),
  • SAP’s licensing and contract terms (70 percent),
  • the end of maintenance (63 percent),
  • the implementation of legal requirements (59 percent), and
  • the complexity of the system landscape (51 percent).

S/4Hana is gaining momentum, but…

With the clock ticking, migration to SAP S/4Hana is also an important issue for SAP users – unless it has already been completed. According to the survey, 42 percent of companies are planning high or medium investments in S/4HANA On-Premises in 2026. The private cloud variant accounts for 22 percent, while the public cloud accounts for only six percent.

S/4Hana On-Premises is already in use at 56 percent of respondents, with 17 percent running the solution in the private cloud and five percent in the public cloud – a sign, in DSAG’s view, that SAP’s cloud plan is not quite working out and that the Walldorf-based company needs to offer companies more freedom of choice.

At the same time, 54 percent of companies still use SAP ECC or the old SAP Business Suite (somewhere), although multiple answers were possible here. Of the companies using SAP ECC, almost half plan to use Extended Maintenance at an additional cost and migrate to SAP S/4HANA by the end of 2030. Thirty-seven percent want to migrate by the end of 2027, while four percent are aiming to complete the transition by the end of 2033 and thus plan to use SAP ERP, Private Edition, Transition Options.

As DSAG CEO Hungershausen explains, this is not happening on a whim. Many would not wait until 2030 to make the switch, but need this time due to the complexity of their system landscapes. Other reasons for choosing this path despite higher maintenance costs include a shortage of skilled workers, parallel transformation projects, and limited budgets.

SAP Business Suite needs explanation

According to the survey, SAP is still struggling to communicate the target vision of the new Business Suite with Cloud ERP, Business AI, Business Data Cloud, and Business Technology Platform to users: 35 percent said they were strongly or very strongly guided by it in their investment planning, while 62 percent said they were less strongly guided or not guided at all.

The integrated toolchain (Cloud ALM, Signavio, LeanIX, WalkMe) has also not yet really caught on with many companies: 24 percent already use the toolchain partially or fully, while 39 percent plan to use at least parts of it. Seventeen percent do not plan to use it, while 16 percent say they are not familiar with it or do not consider it relevant.

Hungershausen points out that individual components of the tool collection are already in use in many companies. For example, Cloud ALM is often used as a replacement for SAP Solution Manager.

“The picture is similar for both the integrated toolchain and the target vision for the new SAP Business Suite,” says the DSAG chairman: “Companies expect clear statements on added value, integration into existing landscapes, and economic viability. Only then will strategic target visions be translated more strongly into real investment decisions.”

Does SAP have an AI problem?

The company is also struggling with the topic of artificial intelligence, which SAP is currently promoting: 43 percent of companies have already implemented AI use cases, but the majority have not. It is also striking that productive AI scenarios are predominantly implemented with non-SAP solutions (77 percent), while SAP solutions have so far played only a minor role at three percent. Nevertheless, 62 percent are conducting proof-of-concepts with non-SAP solutions and 26 percent with SAP solutions.

DSAG attributes these results in particular to the varying complexity of application scenarios. “A use case in the SAP environment has different requirements than the use of standard solutions based on large language models,” says Hungershausen. It is important that customers make their existing system landscapes “clean core ready” in order to reap the full benefits of the multitude of SAP-based scenarios.

“The fact that most use cases are implemented with non-SAP solutions is also a signal to SAP. Many companies still work with on-premises systems or highly customized landscapes in which AI innovations have so far only been usable to a limited extent. As a user association, we would like to see more freedom of choice, transparency, and realistic migration paths,” states Hungershausen.


Read More from This Article: SAP users show pragmatism under pressure
Source: News

Category: NewsFebruary 27, 2026
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:One Identity Appoints Michael Henricks as Chief Financial and Operating OfficerNextNext post:量子コンピューターとは何か いまさら聞けない基本と「できること/できないこと」

Related posts

AI, power and the trade-off between freedom and innovation
May 14, 2026
Building an AI CoE: Why you need one and how to make it work
May 14, 2026
AI-driven layoffs aren’t making business sense
May 14, 2026
CIOs are put to the test as security regulations across borders recalibrate
May 14, 2026
How deepfakes are rewriting the rules of the modern workplace
May 14, 2026
Decision-making speed is a hidden constraint on transformation success
May 14, 2026
Recent Posts
  • AI, power and the trade-off between freedom and innovation
  • Building an AI CoE: Why you need one and how to make it work
  • AI-driven layoffs aren’t making business sense
  • CIOs are put to the test as security regulations across borders recalibrate
  • How deepfakes are rewriting the rules of the modern workplace
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2026
    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.