Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

SAP offers concessions to EU regulators to avert an antitrust probe into ERP practices

SAP has reportedly submitted concessions to the European Commission, aimed at resolving antitrust concerns related to its ERP software business practices.

The move represents a preemptive effort by the German technology giant to avoid a formal investigation that could result in fines of up to 10% of its annual global revenue.

The concessions address longstanding complaints from businesses about SAP’s complex licensing terms, bundling practices that drive up costs, and barriers that make it difficult for customers to switch to competing vendors, reported Reuters.

The report further added that SAP has made a formal proposal to address regulatory concerns but declined to provide specific details about the concessions.

Industry complaints sparked EU scrutiny

The European Commission’s scrutiny stems from specific complaints filed by enterprise customers and industry groups. Most notably, in October 2018, the German IT Users Association (VOICE) — whose 400 members include major corporations such as Siemens, Adidas, and Volkswagen — filed a formal antitrust complaint with Germany’s Federal Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt) against SAP’s licensing policies.

The VOICE complaint specifically targeted SAP’s “indirect use” licensing model, which requires customers to pay additional fees when third-party applications access SAP data.

The association argued that these licensing terms violate the EU Software Directive 2009/24/EC, which protects free interoperability between devices and computer programs, and constitute an abuse of SAP’s dominant market position.

This wasn’t an isolated complaint. Earlier, in 2010, Texas-based software company Versata filed an antitrust complaint with the European Commission, alleging that SAP illegally excluded it from selling to major companies by refusing to share interoperability information and bundling competing software with its ERP products.

Versata accused SAP of cloning its “pricier” software and combining it with SAP’s dominant ERP offering to force customers away from third-party alternatives.

European Commission’s multi-year investigation

Building on these complaints, the European Commission launched its own systematic examination of ERP market practices.

The report added that the Commission had sent a questionnaire to various companies in 2022 and sought detailed answers about ERP aftermarket support services. The inquiry examined the practices of both SAP and Oracle, the two major players in the enterprise software market.

The questionnaire specifically probed whether companies were free to continue support service contracts with original vendors or switch to rivals, whether customers could freely select and customize support services, and what barriers they faced in migrating from on-premises services to cloud solutions. Regulators also examined whether SAP and Oracle disparaged competitors in their business practices.

Both SAP and the European Commission declined to comment on this matter.

Why SAP’s market position matters

The stakes are particularly high given SAP’s commanding position in the global ERP market. This dominance has made the company a natural target for regulatory scrutiny as businesses increasingly rely on these mission-critical systems to run their operations.

However, the competitive landscape has shifted significantly in recent years.

Oracle surpassed SAP as the number one ERP applications vendor for the first time in 2024, according to research firm Apps Run the World. Oracle achieved $8.7 billion in ERP revenue versus SAP’s $8.6 billion, ending SAP’s dominance that lasted over four decades.

Substantial financial stakes

The potential financial implications are substantial for SAP, which reported overall revenue of $37 billion (€34.18 billion) in 2024, marking a 10% increase compared to the previous year. EU competition authorities can impose penalties of up to 10% of a company’s worldwide annual turnover for antitrust violations, which could translate to over $3.7 billion (€3.4 billion) in potential fines for SAP based on its current revenue, the report added.

This threat comes at a particularly sensitive time for SAP, as the company’s cloud revenue surged 25% to $18.6 billion (€17.14 billion) in 2024, with Cloud ERP Suite revenue growing 33% to $15.3 billion (€14.17 billion). Maintaining competitive positioning in this rapidly growing market segment is crucial to SAP’s strategic transformation.

Parallel legal challenges

The German company is simultaneously facing legal challenges in multiple jurisdictions. In June, SAP asked the US Supreme Court to review a decision requiring it to face a lawsuit by data technology company Teradata, which accused SAP of violating antitrust law.

Additionally, SAP is defending against an antitrust lawsuit filed by German process mining company Celonis in a San Francisco federal court, though a judge recently dismissed several of Celonis’s claims while allowing the case to proceed to trial on other allegations.


Read More from This Article: SAP offers concessions to EU regulators to avert an antitrust probe into ERP practices
Source: News

Category: NewsSeptember 23, 2025
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:How I use AI to boost productivity and revenueNextNext post:No SAP BTP, no problem: Real-time SAP integration with Databricks

Related posts

「健康情報」はなぜ特別扱いなのか――個人情報保護法から見た医療データ
December 14, 2025
インド・フィンテックの2025年を振り返る
December 14, 2025
ソフトウェアサプライチェーンの透明化が問い直す企業の信頼――SBOM世界標準化の現在地と日本企業が講ずべき生存戦略
December 14, 2025
フェデレーション技術が拓く「集めないデータ活用」の新地平――企業ITが直面する分散型アーキテクチャへの転換点
December 14, 2025
オプトインからオプトアウトへ―次世代医療基盤法が変えた医療データのルール
December 13, 2025
AI ROI: How to measure the true value of AI
December 13, 2025
Recent Posts
  • 「健康情報」はなぜ特別扱いなのか――個人情報保護法から見た医療データ
  • インド・フィンテックの2025年を振り返る
  • ソフトウェアサプライチェーンの透明化が問い直す企業の信頼――SBOM世界標準化の現在地と日本企業が講ずべき生存戦略
  • フェデレーション技術が拓く「集めないデータ活用」の新地平――企業ITが直面する分散型アーキテクチャへの転換点
  • オプトインからオプトアウトへ―次世代医療基盤法が変えた医療データのルール
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.