Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

Microsoft Fabric to lose auto-generated semantic models

Microsoft Fabric users will soon face more work to set up analytics workflows for new datasets, as Microsoft is retiring a feature that automatically creates semantic models on enterprise data.

Semantic models are structured representations of data that that add meaning and context to the raw information held in Fabric. When creating Fabric assets such as warehouses, lakehouses, or SQL databases, users can make their own semantic model — or use an automatically generated Default Semantic Model.

The default option, though, will soon go away by the end of this year, hurting enterprises using them for rapid prototyping or validating data structures, and any Default Semantic Models already created will become regular semantic models, that enterprises must explicitly manage and maintain for themselves, rather than relying on Microsoft’s automated processes.

Microsoft said that retiring the Default Semantic Models is part of its broader push to tighten up data governance across its enterprise offerings.

Microsoft’s strategy to emphasize accountability

Moor Insights and Strategy principal analyst Robert Kramer sees the move as a way for Microsoft to emphasize the importance of accountability in how teams build and manage data models, especially as companies scale up their AI and analytics initiatives.

“This can help organize workspaces and make reporting more transparent. Teams will have better audit trails, clearer lineage, and more accurate usage data,” Kramer said.

This change introduces an additional step for enterprise users, requiring manual creation of semantic models that potentially will slow down rapid prototyping workflows, he said.

“It’s advisable to use Microsoft’s migration script early to avoid any unexpected issues,” Kramer added.

AWS and Google are walking the same path

Microsoft is not the only hyperscaler that is betting on enterprises adopting a well-structured semantic layer instead of one auto-generated on the fly.

Google’s Looker requires users to define their own models using LookML, and more recently the hyperscaler has added Gemini to it to enable AI-generated model suggestions and chat-based analytics to accelerate insights generation.

“AWS takes a different route with QuickSight Topics — machine learning can suggest fields, but authors still curate the model. Both are pushing toward the same end goal: curated, explainable models that work well with AI and keep data governance in check,” Kramer said.

What’s changing and how will the change take effect?

After the retirement of the Default Semantic Models later this year, the process of creating a warehouse, lakehouse, SQL database, or a mirrored database in Fabric will no longer automatically generate a semantic model with the same name, Microsoft said.

At the same time, the Reporting Tab inside Fabric will no longer include options such as ‘New Report,’ ‘Manage default semantic model,’ or ‘Automatically update semantic model,’ which were previously tied to these auto-generated models.

The deprecation of the models also removes features like model layouts and context menu shortcuts that supported quick report creation using these models, Microsoft said. Instead, users will have to explicitly create and manage semantic models through a new entry point under the Home tab.

Existing Default Semantic Models will also be affected. The models will be decoupled from their parent data assets and converted into standalone semantic models, which users will need to manage manually, Microsoft said.

The changes will take place by December 2025, Microsoft said.

Clean up models now to avoid headaches later

To prepare for the changes, Kramer advised, “Enterprises can start by using the Fabric Admin APIs to find all existing Default Semantic Models and tagging them as keep, merge, or retire.”

For the models they choose to keep, he said, “They need to rebuild them as explicit semantic models using Power BI Project (PBIP) or Tabular Model Definition Language (TMDL) so that they can be versioned and governed properly.” The PBIP file format stores Power BI reports and semantic models in a way that supports version control and collaboration, while TMDL is the modeling language used within PBIP files to define and manage the structure and logic of the semantic model.

Enterprises can also add metadata to their models in Microsoft Purview, a suite for managing data governance, to improve discoverability and governance, Kramer suggested.

“Enterprises also have to ensure that analysts are trained on star schema basics so future models are clean, fast, and compliant. Teams that take the time now to clean things up and train properly will avoid headaches later with messy models and performance issues,” he said.

More Microsoft news:

  • Microsoft C++ static analysis tool bolsters warning suppressions
  • Microsoft SharePoint zero-day breach hits on-prem servers
  • Microsoft will stop using Chinese workers on US DoD systems


Read More from This Article: Microsoft Fabric to lose auto-generated semantic models
Source: News

Category: NewsJuly 24, 2025
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:생활용품 업체 크로락스, 코그니전트에 3억 8,000만 달러 소송 제기NextNext post:마이크로소프트 쉐어포인트 제로데이 공격···온프레미스 서버 정조준

Related posts

Why hiring ‘AI engineers’ won’t work
April 23, 2026
人の経験に頼った物流から、データで動く物流へ──SGHグループが挑む「データドリブン経営」の真価
April 22, 2026
Carles Llach: “La tecnología ha generado unas eficiencias enormes en el notariado”
April 22, 2026
The 4 disciplines of delivery — and why conflating them silently breaks your teams
April 22, 2026
The silent failure between approval and delivery
April 22, 2026
AI hype to AI value: Escaping the activity trap
April 22, 2026
Recent Posts
  • Why hiring ‘AI engineers’ won’t work
  • 人の経験に頼った物流から、データで動く物流へ──SGHグループが挑む「データドリブン経営」の真価
  • Carles Llach: “La tecnología ha generado unas eficiencias enormes en el notariado”
  • The 4 disciplines of delivery — and why conflating them silently breaks your teams
  • The silent failure between approval and delivery
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.