Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

Thinking of building your own AI agents? Don’t do it, advisors say

Agentic AIs, a form of technology designed to run specific functions within an organization without human intervention, are gaining traction as enterprises look to automate business workflows, augment the output of human workers, and derive value from generative AI.

Analyst firm Forrester named AI agents as one of its top 10 emerging technologies this year, but it has a warning for companies focused on adopting them: Don’t go it alone. Three-quarters of the organizations that try to build AI agents in house will fail, according to Forrester’s 2025 predictions for AI.

Companies that fail to build their own AI agents will turn to outside AI consulting firms to build custom agents for them, or they will use agents embedded in software from their current vendors, write Forrester analysts Jayesh Chaurasia and Sudha Maheshwari.

“Savvy firms will grasp current limitations and lean on their vendor and systems integrator partners to build agents at the cutting edge of this technology,” they write.

Building AI agents is a complex process, and many organizations don’t have the AI expertise in house to finish the job, they add.

“Agentic AI is all the rage as companies push gen AI beyond basic tasks into more complex actions,” Chaurasia and Maheshwari say. “The challenge is that these architectures are convoluted, requiring multiple models, advanced RAG [retrieval augmented generation] stacks, advanced data architectures, and specialized expertise.”

In addition, the power of agentic AIs is still in its infancy, they say. It may be another two years before they have “any chance of meeting inflated automation hopes,” Chaurasia and Maheshwari write.

The value of DIY agentic AI

Still, some companies see opportunity in the build-it-yourself approach. Goldcast, a software developer focused on video marketing, has experimented with a dozen open-source AI models to assist with various tasks, says Lauren Creedon, head of product at the company.

For example, Goldcast uses one AI model to transcribe videos, another to write a blog post based on a video, a third to create social media posts, and a fourth to identify the people in the video through facial recognition, she says. The goal at Goldcast is to link all these AI models and turn them into agents that do their assigned tasks without human prompts, she says.

Goldcast has taken the abilities of each of these AI models and used specific features for its own use cases and workflows. The company isn’t building its own discrete AI models but is instead harnessing the power of these open-source AIs.

Building on open-source models is a more efficient way to tap into the power of agentic AIs than creating AI agents from scratch, Creedon says.

“I don’t want people to think of [AI] as hard and a specialized thing that only people with PhDs can work with,” she says. “The more people who are enabled on how to work with it, and the more teams that work with it, the better outcomes will get, not only for business operations, but for customers.”

But Creedon agrees with Forrester’s assessment that building AI agents can be a complex process. Organizations will need a fully formed MLOps plan, and some companies may not have the expertise to do it themselves, she says.

Advanced teams will be required to “take a number of these different open-source models and pair them together in a workflow,” Creedon adds. In many cases, organizations will need to turn to outside specialists to set up AI agents.

Still, it’s possible to do it yourself, says Senthil Kumar, CTO and head of AI at Slate Technologies, a data analytics provider for construction and related industries.

Slate Technologies began rolling out its own AI agents three years ago, even before the AI boom kicked off with the release of ChatGPT.

“What has been an aspirational technology to look forward to a few years ago is being realized,” Kumar says.

With several LLM AIs now available, smart companies can experiment with them and train autonomous agents based on their specific needs, he says.

“We are fortunate to be able to stand on the shoulders of giants and learn from others’ experiences in the space.” Kumar adds. “Start with one [AI model], and you can start tailoring its behavior. You know your ecosystem much better than a generic solution that exists outside, with consultants outside.”

Humans in the loop

One key to building successful AI agents is human supervision, which is always necessary even when agents are built to run autonomously, Kumar says. Organizations can’t build an AI agent, unleash it, and forget about it; instead, they need to check the results and continuously find ways to improve them.

“It’s a collaborative process of evolving between the whole AI ecosystem and the human counterparts,” he says. “The focus would be on how those agents would learn, the knowledge acquisition of agents, and how the agents are going to be able to disseminate knowledge.”

For many companies, however, the decision to build their own AI agents or work with a consultant isn’t an easy one, says Chris Ackerson, head of AI at AlphaSense, an AI-powered market intelligence firm.

Large companies may be tempted to roll their own highly customized agents, he says, but they can get tripped up by fragmented internal data, by underestimating the resources needed, and by lacking in-house expertise.

“While some companies may achieve success, it’s common for these projects to spiral out of control in terms of cost and complexity,” Ackerson says. “In many cases, buying a solution from a trusted partner can help organizations avoid the pitfalls of builder’s remorse and accelerate their path to success.”

AlphaSense has trained its own AI agents, but many companies lack internal expertise, he says. In addition, organizations may project the development costs but ignore the cost of ongoing maintenance, he adds.

“This is the largest cost, as maintaining AI systems over time can be complex and resource-intensive, requiring constant updates, monitoring, and optimization to ensure long-term functionality,” Ackerson says.

Partnering with an AI provider can give companies access to proven, ready-made agents that have been tested and refined by thousands of users, he contends.

“It’s faster to implement, less resource-intensive, and comes with the added benefit of ongoing updates and support — freeing companies to focus on other critical areas of their business,” he says.

The value of a partner

Many organizations won’t need to train their own AI agents, says Adnan Masood, chief AI architect at UST, a digital transformation provider.

“Reinventing the wheel is indeed a bad idea when it comes to complex systems like agentic AI architectures,” he says. “These architectures are inherently intricate, involving a multitude of components.”

One of the many challenges, he says, is to implement robust memory management in an agentic AI system. The process goes beyond storing and retrieving information and includes intelligently managing context, understanding the relevance of past interactions, and dynamically adapting the AI’s responses based on an evolving knowledge base.

In addition, building an agentic AI from the ground up would involve designing complex data structures, implementing efficient search algorithms, and fine-tuning the AI’s ability to interpret and prioritize information, he adds. This would require organizations to have specialized expertise in machine learning, natural language processing, and data engineering.

“By turning to specialists or adopting pre-built solutions, or tapping into the open-source ecosystem, they can leverage the expertise and experience of those who have already navigated these challenges, ultimately increasing their chances of success,” Masood says.


Read More from This Article: Thinking of building your own AI agents? Don’t do it, advisors say
Source: News

Category: NewsSeptember 19, 2024
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:AI could be taken over by a few multinationals, warns UNNextNext post:7 steps to a more adaptive enterprise

Related posts

Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
May 30, 2025
Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
May 30, 2025
The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
May 30, 2025
Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
May 30, 2025
“AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
May 30, 2025
“ROI는 어디에?” AI 도입을 재고하게 만드는 실패 사례
May 30, 2025
Recent Posts
  • Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
  • Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
  • The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
  • Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
  • “AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.