Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

The Blockchain battlefront: Technology, business, and regulation

Comedian John Oliver quipped that cryptocurrency is “everything you don’t understand about money combined with everything you don’t understand about technology.”  He missed another area of notorious confusion: the law.  The great regulatory bureaucracy has awakened to the significance of blockchain-enabled technology, led by the SEC. 

The government is certain that cryptocurrency must be regulated, but it is faced with a knotty question: What kind of asset is cryptocurrency?  Security?  Commodity?  Currency?  Something else?  Meanwhile, technologists and entrepreneurs are creating new applications that affect the answer. 

The new engine of innovation that the crypto markets looks a lot like the corporate stock shares we are familiar with, except with fewer intermediaries and less (you guessed it) regulation.  Ventures can mint tokens that are representative of the underlying technology, thereby funding business activities with a mechanism directly tied to those activities.  This drives innovation because innovators are free to embark on funding efforts without third party involvement, and the market is able to reward success and punish failure with minimal interference.

The resemblance to stocks has not gone unnoticed by the SEC.  In fact, the capacity of cryptocurrency to act as an investment vehicle is the hinge upon which the future of the crypto industry will turn.  Such vehicles are regulated as securities in federal law.  So, we return to the nuanced question of what kind of asset are crypto currencies?

Currency, security, or commodity

The obvious answer is cryptocurrencies are currencies!  It’s there in the name.  BitCoin started the whole industry by proposing to create a digital currency to stand alongside fiat currencies as a medium of exchange.  But cryptocurrencies have expanded far beyond this notion, and even in the case of a straight crypto coin like BitCoin, the asset doesn’t behave like currency.

The next bucket into which crypto assets might fall is commodities.  Commodities are regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).  These include assets like gold, oil, and wheat—in general, a commodity is any asset that is an item of value, and the financial activity around it is based on the changing supply and demand for that item.  Strangely, for a non-physical entity, BitCoin and its relatives share some characteristics with this asset class:  Because blockchain transactions are permanent entries in the global ledger, they can be traded and valued something like a commodity. 

The final traditional asset class to consider is securities.  The Howey test (based on a case from the 1940s that established the SEC’s area of authority) is a standard test for determining whether something is a security.  The three distinguishing characteristics of securities are:

A. The investment of money

B. Common enterprise

C. Reasonable expectation of profits derived from efforts of others

The first two characteristics are fairly easy to establish in the case of most digital assets.  ‘C’ however is more difficult to determine, and this is where we return to the observation that crypto assets act a lot like shares, which is precisely what ‘C’ is driving at. 

The universe of digital assets has a wide range of nuanced differences, bearing characteristics of all three asset classes—currency, commodity, and security—in varying helpings. 

We can start to get an understanding of how the SEC is thinking about these questions by looking at what SEC chair Gary Gensler said about BitCoin being a different animal from the rest. He has said on a couple occasions that BitCoin, and only BitCoin, is a commodity. 

This has been backed up with action.  In May, the SEC doubled its crypto enforcement arm and renamed it to “Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit”.   It opened a probe with Coinbase and has initiated an insider trading case that incorporates a securities charge, which would bring at least some crypto projects under the SEC’s jurisdiction.

These moves were criticized by CFTC commissioner Caroline Pham who said they were a “striking example of ‘regulation by enforcement,’”  a critique that suggests both that the CFTC is interested in finding its footing in regulating the space and that clarity in the field is lacking.

Why classification matters

The general consensus is that by being classed as securities, the crypto industry will be more heavily regulated, but it also stand to grow more expansively as it matures.  As a commodity, crypto would be less regulated, but also more limited in terms of growth. 

Stepping back, it seems pretty clear that crypto-enabled digital assets are a new kind of thing, bearing characteristics of each asset category depending on the project.  For example, some projects are explicitly invoking the stock fundraising model with “initial coin offerings” (ICO), the crypto equivalent of the traditional IPO.  This is why the SEC has a spotlight on ICOs.

It is likely that we’ll start to see litmus tests that determine what camp crypto projects fall into, with securities demanding the most rigorous vetting.  All of this will of course increase the overhead in running these projects, slowing innovation in the short term.  In the long term, approval at the federal levels will bring greater adoption and more investment into the space.

In the middle term, we’ll see a convergence of traditional stock markets and crypto exchanges—something that is already happening.  The FTX crypto exchange recently included stocks, while Webull, a more traditional exchange, includes crypto. 

The ongoing battle

Perhaps the most central battle in the larger war is that between the SEC and Ripple.  Ripple created the XRP coin, designed for blockchain-based payments.  The SEC and Ripple have been locked in an epic legal struggle since December of 0221, when the SEC sued Ripple for raising over a $1 billion via sales of their token, alleging it is an unregistered security.

It’s such a precedent-setting battle on unknown terrain, that hitherto unconsidered issues are arising.  For example, on July 30, 2022 a third party entered the fray claiming cryptographic keys should be redacted from the proceedings, similar to how bank accounts are handled.

The SEC action put a big dent in XRP value and caused it to be delisted from US exchanges like Coinbase.  It also sent a shiver through the entire industry.  The truth is both sides have a point: The streamlined fundraising, married closely to the actual technological medium hold astonishing promise for innovation, but it has great potential for abuse. 

A even-handed approach that avoids forcing crypto assets into existing categories and frameworks is required.  Not only do we want to avoid throwing a wet blanket on the entrepreneurial promise, but blockchains are decentralized global networks, and we don’t want to force them into the shadows but welcome them into the fold in a way that preserves their unique characteristics and gives adequate protection to investors and users.

One size does not fit all in software projects.  A small open-source project looking to fund itself should not be treated with the same instrument as a big enterprise effort.  Hopefully, in addition to a suitable blending of categories, a sensible scaling of laws can be devised, to allow for the space to innovate with agility that is so essential to software projects of all kinds.

Blockchain, Regulation


Read More from This Article: The Blockchain battlefront: Technology, business, and regulation
Source: News

Category: NewsAugust 19, 2022
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Aflac virtualizes the customer enrollment experienceNextNext post:Securing the ever-evolving hybrid work environment

Related posts

휴먼컨설팅그룹, HR 솔루션 ‘휴넬’ 업그레이드 발표
May 9, 2025
Epicor expands AI offerings, launches new green initiative
May 9, 2025
MS도 합류··· 구글의 A2A 프로토콜, AI 에이전트 분야의 공용어 될까?
May 9, 2025
오픈AI, 아시아 4국에 데이터 레지던시 도입··· 한국 기업 데이터는 한국 서버에 저장
May 9, 2025
SAS supercharges Viya platform with AI agents, copilots, and synthetic data tools
May 8, 2025
IBM aims to set industry standard for enterprise AI with ITBench SaaS launch
May 8, 2025
Recent Posts
  • 휴먼컨설팅그룹, HR 솔루션 ‘휴넬’ 업그레이드 발표
  • Epicor expands AI offerings, launches new green initiative
  • MS도 합류··· 구글의 A2A 프로토콜, AI 에이전트 분야의 공용어 될까?
  • 오픈AI, 아시아 4국에 데이터 레지던시 도입··· 한국 기업 데이터는 한국 서버에 저장
  • SAS supercharges Viya platform with AI agents, copilots, and synthetic data tools
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.