Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

Reducing CIO-CISO tension requires recognizing the signs

CIOs and CISOs operate in high-stress environments that can at times place additional strain on their relationship, further distracting them from achieving beneficial outcomes.

In my own career, I’ve been a CIO and a CISO, so I have firsthand experience with this issue from both perspectives. Defusing the situation so that the relationship is workable, healthy, and respectful for both parties can be challenging, especially for CISOs, who often reportto the CIO. It requires understanding the pressure and priorities of the other’s role, as well as how your partner operates.

Relationship ripe for tension

To understand why there is natural friction between CIOs and CISOs, one must consider the pressures and priorities of each.

The role of the CIO is filled with a multitude of activities that all demand attention and have high visibility with executive management and the board, which want to see the CIO on top of the IT agenda.

That agenda — the raison d’être for the CIO — is to enable business transformation and growth through use of technology. Key stakeholders throughout the company demand delivery of tech-enabled change and positive customer experiences from these platforms, and the CIO is judged on their ability to not only deliver these new digital solutions but also keep operational processes from being impacted by an outage or disruption to service.

Meanwhile, the CISO’s mandate is to protect the enterprise from external threats. Yes, the CIO cares about this too, but they also face pressure from their business stakeholders when it comes to the trade-offs that may be required to secure the enterprise.

These trade-offs are pinch points that intersect with the CISO’s remit, highlighting conflicting priorities for both parties. Over time, such situations — and how they are handled and resolved — can lead to real friction between the two parties. This friction can be overt, boiling over in public, or covert, where it is more hidden from other colleagues or the CIO/CISO themselves.

Common CIO-CISO pressure points

In every mature enterprise risks have to be accepted for the time being, with remediation deferred. Vulnerability patching is one example where tension between the CIO and CISO can arise.

In the case of highly critical vulnerabilities that have been exploited, the CISO will want patches applied immediately, and the CIO is likely aligned with this urgency. But for medium-level patches, the CIO may be under pressure to defer these disruptions to production systems, and may push back on the CISO to wait a week or even months before patching.

The same tension exists for programs that impact digital customer experience. For example, new multifactor authentication functionality requires new customer communications and perhaps associated short-term disruption of the channel, something that may be difficult for the business to accept.

Or the CIO and the engineering team may be working with business units to facilitate new customer features via an API platform. From the CISO’s perspective, those APIs must be managed properly, and even penetration-tested, to ensure they don’t create an unexpected data loss vector. The CISO will want more controls applied, but the CIO, while agreeing in principle, must also satisfy the stakeholders by ensuring the feature is delivered, often in a short time frame.

Incident management is another are ripe for tension. The CISO has a leadership role to play when there is a serious cyber or business disruption incident, and is often the“messenger” that shares the bad news. Naturally, the CIO wants to be immediately informed, but often the details are sparse with many unknowns. This can make the CISO look bad to the CIO, as there are often more questions than answers at this early stage.

A fifth example is DevOps, as many CIOs, including myself, advocate for continuous delivery at velocity. Unfortunately, not as many CIOs advocate for DevSecOps to embed cybersecurity testing in the process. This is perhaps because the CIO is often under pressure from executive stakeholders to release new software builds and thus accept the risk that there may be some iteration required if this is not perfect. Meanwhile, not many CISOs come from a software developer background, and so are often not comfortable engaging with and challenging this process.

How differing CIO and CISO archetypes engage

The above areas of friction have nothing to do with the personalities of the CIO and CISO, an additional incompatibility issue that can create further strain on the relationship.

The CIO and CISO are likely to have arrived at their positions through different career paths and may have a differing approach to their work. Some of these resulting archetypes naturally work better together, while others may clash.

CIO and CISO archetypes

CIO and CISO archetypes

David Gee

My advice here is to consider how your counterparty operates, what is their natural style, and how you might approach potential pressure points differently. For instance, a Business CIO or Partnering CIO will value stakeholder engagement as key for success. If paired with a Technical CISO or Transformational CISO there may be some mismatch of approach.

How to manage this tension

If you find you are operating in a scenario of elevated CIO-CISO tension, or you recognize there is a natural divergence of your approaches, it is important for both the CIO and CISO to acknowledge this issue and work through how to reconcile their differences.

In these circumstances it is best to sit down and discuss how to work together respectfully and with business objectives in mind. Some suggested principles to consider include:

  1. Adopt a company-first attitude.
  2. Understand the business benefits of all proposed actions.
  3. Be fact-driven.
  4. Be transparent and honest but never offensive.
  5. Look for the win-win.

This approach may not work if both parties are not committed to effecting a change. If that’s the case, then a reset may be required, with a third party or independent coach brought on board to help facilitate the relationship. Hopefully this reset can be made with some small tweaks, without one or both of the parties giving up and walking away.

A healthy dose of tension is good for the CIO and CISO in their everyday work. But this has to be managed so that it does not become conflict that spills over to create non-productive situations. That would be a lose-lose for both parties, and not a great outcome for the business as a whole.


Read More from This Article: Reducing CIO-CISO tension requires recognizing the signs
Source: News

Category: NewsMay 21, 2024
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:IT leaders look beyond LLMs for gen AI needsNextNext post:A Glance at the Intelligent Network Plans from Huawei Analyst Summit 2024

Related posts

Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
May 30, 2025
Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
May 30, 2025
The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
May 30, 2025
Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
May 30, 2025
“AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
May 30, 2025
“ROI는 어디에?” AI 도입을 재고하게 만드는 실패 사례
May 30, 2025
Recent Posts
  • Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
  • Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
  • The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
  • Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
  • “AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.