Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

Microsoft can’t keep up with demand for AI in the cloud — for now

When Microsoft posted its quarterly earnings last week, its CFO Amy Hood said that customers wanted more cloud compute for their AI workloads than the company could supply.

“Near-term AI demand is a bit higher than our available capacity,” Hood said Thursday, during a conference call to discuss the company’s quarterly results for the quarter ended March 31.

Microsoft posted revenue of $61.9 billion for the quarter, up 17% year on year, of which $26.7 billion (up 21%) came from its Intelligent Cloud segment, consisting of Azure and other public, private, and hybrid server products and cloud services. The cloud figure excludes Bing Search and Xbox Cloud Gaming, which are part of its More Personal Computing segment, where revenue rose 17% to $15.6 billion, and Microsoft 365 and Dynamics 365, part of its Productivity and Business Processes segment, where revenue rose 12% to $19.6 billion.

Within the Intelligent Cloud segment, revenue from Azure and other cloud services grew 31% year on year, ahead of expectations, with AI services contributing 7 points of growth, Hood said.

But Azure’s growth could have been even greater: The shortfall in AI cloud capacity had an impact on revenue in the quarter, and will in the next quarter, too, Hood said.

Balancing supply and demand

Microsoft must balance cloud demand each quarter against its infrastructure investment plans for the next, and is already planning to spend more. “We expect capital expenditures to increase materially on a sequential basis driven by cloud and AI infrastructure investments,” Hood said.

This balancing act, according to Dylan Patel, chief analyst at semiconductor research firm Semianalysis, can be seen in the company’s phased rollout plan for AI copilots across various service offerings.

“Many features have been developed for Windows and Office copilots without having been deployed due to the lack of compute. GitHub Copilot is still using a much smaller model,” Patel said.

When suppliers can’t meet demand in in other domains, they may raise prices until demand falls off, or customers may seek alternative sources or substitute different products.

Customers are unlikely to go elsewhere, though, as AI workloads are often fueled by large amounts of enterprise data from applications running in the same cloud. The sheer cost and complexity of the migration process would discourage existing enterprise customers from moving to another cloud provider over short-term capacity issues.

“Sometimes the level of technical debt incurred in migrating a well-established project can outweigh any concerns over latency,” said Bradley Shimmin, chief analyst at research firm Omdia, adding that enterprises using AI for mission critical applications would be even less likely to change providers.

And although Microsoft may have lost out on a little revenue growth as a result of the capacity constraints, analysts said it is at no risk of losing new customers to its rivals.

“The demand for AI is so large that there simply isn’t enough capacity to put large language models (LLMs) into every application that enterprises want to. AWS and Google both have capacity issues as well. Microsoft is not unique,” said Semianalysis’ Patel.

It may even have an edge because it started building out its AI stack before its rivals, he said.

“AWS and Google still do not properly serve models with GPT-4 Turbo capabilities, for example,” Patel said, adding that his firm’s analysis shows that Microsoft is no longer losing money on API calls and has a healthy margin, giving it yet another advantage against rivals.

Price hikes unlikely

Even with a largely captive customer base, Microsoft is unlikely to resort to price hikes as a way to manage demand, at least in the short term, analysts said.

With immature technologies such as generative AI, Microsoft and its competitors face challenges accurately forecasting changes in demand, according to digital services firm West Monroe’s lead of high-tech and software practice, Dhaval Moogimane. While occasional discrepancies between capacity and demand may persist, it is unlikely to manifest as a protracted or systemic issue that would lead to price hikes, Moogimane said.

Instead, said Shimmin, Microsoft and other hyperscalers will likely resort to other tactics to manage demand, such as downgrading response times for customers paying less or making use of batch inferencing, a process in which predictions are made, stored, and later presented on request. This can be more efficient than online or dynamic inferencing, where predictions are generated in real time.

Batch inferencing, especially in support of API calls is rapidly becoming “a thing” among model hosting providers according, to Shimmin.

Customers shouldn’t be surprised at imbalances between demand and supply in cloud computing, according to IDC analyst Rijo George Thomas: They’re not new and enterprises have been complaining about them since the beginning of the Covid pandemic. “IDC’s Wave surveys have revealed that supply chain constraints were one of the top concerns, at least for Asia-Pacific IT leaders, affecting their tech strategies and budgets,” Thomas said.

Generative AI, Microsoft


Read More from This Article: Microsoft can’t keep up with demand for AI in the cloud — for now
Source: News

Category: NewsApril 29, 2024
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Capitalizing on technology budgets: A CIO’s storyNextNext post:建設DXで業態転換を目指す創業425年の老舗建設会社

Related posts

Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
May 30, 2025
Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
May 30, 2025
The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
May 30, 2025
Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
May 30, 2025
“AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
May 30, 2025
“ROI는 어디에?” AI 도입을 재고하게 만드는 실패 사례
May 30, 2025
Recent Posts
  • Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
  • Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
  • The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
  • Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
  • “AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.