Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

How the new AI executive order stacks up: B-

The White House’s new executive order, “Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence,” is poised to usher in a new era of national AI regulation, focusing on safety and responsibility across the sector. But will it? 

The executive order represents the U.S. government’s opening salvo in creating a comprehensive regulatory framework for AI, applicable both in the federal government and the private sector. While it addresses a broad spectrum of objectives for the AI ecosystem and builds upon previous directives related to AI, it is not without its challenges, notably a lack of accountability and specific timelines alongside potentially over-reaching reporting requirements.

Instead of setting up a few guardrails for the AI industry to guide itself, the executive order holds fast to an outdated approach to regulation in which the government will somehow guide AI’s future on its own. As other recent technology waves have taught us, developments will simply come too fast for such an approach and will be driven by the speed of private industry. Here are my thoughts regarding its potential implications and effectiveness.

AI regulations

The executive order calls for creating new safety and security standards for AI, most notably by requiring the largest of model developers to share safety test results with the federal government. However, and very importantly, the reporting requirements for the very large number of companies and builders fine-tuning the regulated large models for their particular use cases remain unclear.

AI must be regulated. It is a very powerful technology, and while it is not inherently good or bad, given its sheer power, guardrails must be put into place. While the executive order takes a focused approach towards applying these standards to the largest model developers, reporting requirements should continue to mirror the progressive structure of other regulated industries such that the largest underlying infrastructure providers that affect every American carry the regulatory burden. In contrast, US regulators must have a light touch with startups to maintain the country’s leadership position in innovation. 

AI security

While it is refreshing to see the specificity in a handful of elements, such as the Department of Commerce’s development of guidance for content authentication and watermarking to label AI-generated content clearly, many security goals remain open to interpretation. 

In citing the Defense Production Act as its precedence around sharing “test results and other critical information with the US government,” which can nationalize businesses during emergencies, the order’s breadth and vagueness in wording could pave the way for over-reach. While it might be touted as upholding American values, the potential for overreach is palpable. This section of the executive order also includes vagaries such as “The Departments of Energy and Homeland Security will also address AI systems’ threats to critical infrastructure, as well as chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and cybersecurity risks.” The vague wording and breadth of the order leave room for ambiguity, potentially leading to unintended consequences.

Protecting consumer privacy

The AI Executive Order also calls to protect consumer privacy by creating guidelines for agencies to assess privacy techniques used in AI. If the agencies adopt these guidelines, they could be helpful to entrepreneurs who wish to avoid run-ins with the regulatory agencies. Naturally, such guidelines are only effective in encouraging innovation if they are consistently applied. 

Similarly, the executive order calls for the Department of Health and Human Services to develop programs and resources on how educators can responsibly use AI tools. Such a use-case-specific approach to regulation is effective as it allows regulators to apply existing frameworks that guide technological innovation in these domains. 

Opening up the code

An alarming detail in the Executive Order requires AI companies to ‘pull back the curtain’ and share their products’ internal testing data with the National Institute of Standards and Technology. This group is designated to set the safety standards for “red-team” testing ensuring safety before any public release.

Regulation of AI research and development makes little sense, given the speed of innovation. Instead, it would be best to apply a lighter touch on R&D and to adapt as innovation unfolds. Thus, additional clarity around reporting of deep R&D is needed. 

Recruiting AI talent

The aspect of the executive order that is perhaps the most encouraging is the calls for the opening of existing visa criteria, interviews, and reviews to provide for more ‘highly skilled immigrants and non-immigrants’ with critical AI expertise to stay and work in the United States. 

This would include loosening the tight H-1B work authorization criteria for non-U.S.-born workers. The executive order seeks to ease immigration for highly skilled workers, which is a critical element to continuing the growth of American AI companies, research, and a professional workforce. 

It has been five years since I addressed this issue and how attracting and retaining fresh talent, educators, and data scientists must be a part of our national agenda. I stand by those words even more so today. 

Immigrants have provided the fuel behind America’s technology startups. Immigrants have founded 55% of U.S. startup companies (valued at $1 billion and higher), according to a 2022 National Foundation for American Policy analysis. Even more importantly, 64% of billion-dollar unicorns were founded/co-founded by immigrants or their offspring.  

The same think tank recently estimated that immigrants founded or co-founded 65% of top U.S. AI companies (28 out of 43 companies), with 42% of the founders having come to the United States as international students. 

The numbers clearly show that international entrepreneurs are meaningfully contributing to the tech/AI industry, and it is in our national interest to continue to attract and retain fresh talent to take a leadership position in AI. 

It is critical to invest in our existing students, along with international workers. The executive order establishes the National AI Research Resource to strengthen AI research by giving students and AI researchers access to essential AI resources and data and to provide technical assistance for small businesses. 

These students will become the next machine learning experts, the AI algorithm engineers, and tomorrow’s company founders who can foster AI’s full potential and help drive American innovation and leadership. These are encouraging steps to foster development in this fast-growing industry. 

The executive order represents a step in the pivotal regulation and advancement of AI in the United States. However, it has its challenges and ambiguities, which warrant further scrutiny and refinement. 

Artificial Intelligence, Government
Read More from This Article: How the new AI executive order stacks up: B-
Source: News

Category: NewsNovember 10, 2023
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:4 ways ICA rebuilds and cleans up ITNextNext post:Securing your AI-powered network transformation: A guide for C-suite leaders

Related posts

Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
May 30, 2025
Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
May 30, 2025
The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
May 30, 2025
Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
May 30, 2025
“AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
May 30, 2025
“ROI는 어디에?” AI 도입을 재고하게 만드는 실패 사례
May 30, 2025
Recent Posts
  • Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
  • Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
  • The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
  • Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
  • “AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.