Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

How not to waste 34 hours a month in meetings

None of the participants will ever forget this meeting, that much is certain. The venue was the US Department of Defense, starring a new Secretary of State responsible for procurement, who was to lead her first meeting with suppliers and colleagues from her own company. When she entered the room, she was faced with 60 participants. She said, “Ok, it’s best if we just form a circle at the beginning. Everyone briefly introduces themselves and says why they are here.” The participants rolled their eyes, but did as they were told.

After the first two presentations, the State Secretary said: “Thank you very much for your interest. But we don’t need you here today.” After others had heard this announcement, more and more people who were not yet in line broke away from the circle, took their bags, greeted the group without a word and disappeared. Within about 20 minutes, 60 participants had become 12.

This story, told by Bain & Co. partner Michael C. Mankings on the Harvard Business Review blog, contains one of the most important principles for successful meetings: small groups. But the group size of 12 attendees that was created in the end in this instance is still too large, according to widespread expert opinion.

Capping meeting participation at 7

In their book Decide & Deliver, the US management masterminds Marcia W. Blenko, Michael C. Mankins, and Paul Rogers formulated “the law of seven.” Growing a meeting group beyond seven people, according to their thesis, reduces effectiveness by 10% for each additional participant. Doing the math, meetings with 17 or more participants are even completely unsuitable for making any decisions.

Many readers probably think at this point: “Even in meetings with only five participants, we don’t decide anything, but talk too much.” Meetings have become a real plague in many companies. And that is due in large part to their sheer quantity.

34 hours per month in meetings

Software manufacturer Altassian has evaluated several studies and surveys on the subject of meetings. In Germany, for example, the average employee participates in 65 meetings per month, considers half of them to be totally superfluous, and estimates they spend about 34 working hours per month in meetings.

This more or less breaks down to 8.5 hours per week, with the time necessary for preparation and follow-up not taken into account. Why so much time in so many meetings? The answer is both simple and frightening: Because it has always been that way.

Pseudo-important self-promoters

And because hardly anyone questions it. Chiefs and subchiefs confirm their importance and power (to themselves and each other) in pseudo-important chatter. And team members keep attending because the head of department is there, because it is done that way, because everyone goes, and because staying away would be interpreted as refusal to work, disinterest, perhaps even obstruction. At least that’s what they believe.

The ritualized madness does not change because no one asks the decisive question: “Do we really need a meeting to clarify topic XY?” Or maybe a bilateral conversation, a phone call, a short briefing of two to three people is enough? The unspoken principle in many companies is: If there is something to clarify, then there is also a meeting. Everyone is there, no one feels excluded, and because no more than 20% of those involved are interested in the content anyway, the others can post something in peace or answer private e-mails via smartphone.

Maximum two topics per meeting

If a meeting is to be truly meaningful, it should revolve around a maximum of two topics. There must be clear agendas for each of these two topics, including the appropriate preparation. An employee should be specifically responsible for a topic, prepare it, set up the agenda and moderate it.

Start and end on time

If a meeting officially starts at 2 p.m., then it is unacceptable for participants to show at 2:15 p.m. All they are expressing is that they don’t care enough about the event and have no respect for their colleagues’ time. As a rigorous but effective countermeasure, it is advisable to lock the door of the conference room from the inside at 2 pm.

The end of the meeting must be handled just as rigorously. After all, the quality of the results does not increase with the duration of a meeting. If the meeting is consistently limited to one hour, then everything important is done in one hour. If two hours are scheduled for the same topic, then it takes two. Never more.

Parkinson’s Law on Meeting Procedures

This phenomenon has been known since at least 1955. In that year, the British sociologist C. Northcote Parkinson formulated his Parkinson’s Law: “Work expands to the exact extent that time is available to complete it.” Here, the words “work” and “meeting” are interchangeable, especially since Parkinson was also decidedly concerned with conferences and their processes.

According to his observation, it is not the most important topics that are discussed in the most detail, but the most trivial, because most participants understand something about them and can therefore have a say. Incompetence in important factual issues is compensated for by lengthy speeches on trivial matters, according to Parkinson.

So if you want to avoid babble attacks and thematic frays, you should make sure that the schedule is swift and maintained. If not even the stakeholders have prepared for a topic, then it is best to break off the meeting immediately. Or you can use the moment to ask why no one is interested in the topic in question.

Addressing distracted participants in a targeted manner

The moderator should specifically address consistently silent parties and smartphone users without obviously exposing them. For example: “Mr. Meier, what is your opinion on the subject?” Of course, Mr. Meier won’t say what he really thinks: He doesn’t care about the topic of the meeting at all and likely the whole place as well.

Instead he will make some messed up, likely irrelevant comment. One or two more similar follow-up questions from the moderator will ensure everyone in the room will be of the opinion that Meier could have stayed at his desk.

Department heads and board members should, similar to the State Secretary in the story quoted at the beginning, clearly and repeatedly point out that participation in a meeting is voluntary. And that not always the entire department has to appear, but perhaps only the boss and the employee who is most familiar with the topic in question.

Decisions and work orders

Documentation is also important because it not only shows progress, but also redundancies. Every meeting should end with a decision or at least with a concrete work assignment. If neither exists, this circumstance must also be recorded.

If no decisions are made on a topic more than twice, it should not be put on the agenda again without a good reason.

Sometimes it has to be spiders

Despite the points mentioned, detailed discussion, perhaps even spinning, sometimes makes sense. For example, when creative input and new ideas are sought. However, such processes should take place outside of regular meetings. For example, on Friday afternoon with a non-alcoholic beer.


Read More from This Article: How not to waste 34 hours a month in meetings
Source: News

Category: NewsOctober 3, 2024
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:AI on the mainframe? IBM may be onto somethingNextNext post:El abecé de la IA generativa: estos son los términos clave que tiene que conocer

Related posts

휴먼컨설팅그룹, HR 솔루션 ‘휴넬’ 업그레이드 발표
May 9, 2025
Epicor expands AI offerings, launches new green initiative
May 9, 2025
MS도 합류··· 구글의 A2A 프로토콜, AI 에이전트 분야의 공용어 될까?
May 9, 2025
오픈AI, 아시아 4국에 데이터 레지던시 도입··· 한국 기업 데이터는 한국 서버에 저장
May 9, 2025
SAS supercharges Viya platform with AI agents, copilots, and synthetic data tools
May 8, 2025
IBM aims to set industry standard for enterprise AI with ITBench SaaS launch
May 8, 2025
Recent Posts
  • 휴먼컨설팅그룹, HR 솔루션 ‘휴넬’ 업그레이드 발표
  • Epicor expands AI offerings, launches new green initiative
  • MS도 합류··· 구글의 A2A 프로토콜, AI 에이전트 분야의 공용어 될까?
  • 오픈AI, 아시아 4국에 데이터 레지던시 도입··· 한국 기업 데이터는 한국 서버에 저장
  • SAS supercharges Viya platform with AI agents, copilots, and synthetic data tools
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.