Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

How IT leaders can say yes without killing projects — or their careers

Last December, when discussing the hard truths of the CIO role with CIO.com’s Mary Pratt, West Monroe managing partner Marc Tanowitz observed: “The great CIOs always say yes. They say yes to what the business wants, but they say, ‘But here are the implications. … You have to be OK not doing these other things.”

It’s a conversation IT executives are all too familiar with, especially now, with technology moving at ever faster speeds and paradigms like citizen IT, low- and no-code apps, agile, and IoT taking center stage, often without guardrails and other IT quality assurance checks.

Yet, business itself is also moving increasingly fast today — and technology organizations must not only move with the business, but lead it through digital transformation.

How do you produce the new solutions that business initiatives that come seemingly out of nowhere demand, without falling behind on your own IT strategic plan? Here are a few approaches to accommodating new urgent asks, starting with turning them into an opportunity to advance foundational IT work.

Best choice: Make the most of a bundling opportunity

I’ve always found “bundling” to be a great operating strategy when unforeseen projects with screamingly high priorities come out of nowhere. In fact, by bundling, I found it was possible to accomplish longstanding IT wish-list items that never gained approval in annual budget meetings.

Here’s how it works using three examples:

The company decides to open a manufacturing plant, warehouse facility, and regional office in a new geography because so much business is coming from that area and the CEO and board want to expand operations to be proximate to this customer base. The company will need to add IT to that new site, making this the perfect opportunity to factor in infrastructure upgrades you’ve been asking for over the years. Upgrades to internet services, cloud services, networks, servers, and storage can all be bundled into the project.

Or, the company’s ecommerce platform is taking longer to process orders, and business executives see this as potentially costing the company thousands of transactions per minute — along with the revenue they bring. You’ve wanted to upgrade the underlying hardware, along with the transaction processing software and database for years, but this was always perceived by the CFO as a “nice to have” infrastructure project that was a good idea but not pressing. The revenue-loss concern of the new demand to address the ecommerce platform is a great opportunity for getting those longstanding foundational requests funded.

In a third scenario, the company wants to move more operations to remote edges of the enterprise, and the C-suite and board understand the importance of strong security. In the past, you’ve argued for investments into zero-trust networks, user authentication track-and-trace technologies such as IGA (identify governance administration), and automation that will enable IT to remotely track, fix, upgrade, and shut down devices. But again, these have seemed like “extras” to the CEO and CFO. Now with new edge IT deployments, there is a real opportunity to get a green light for these upgrades. 

Bundling is often how foundational data projects — like breaking down data silos or improving data governance — are achieved. Viewed often as costly projects not specifically tied to revenue opportunities, they can be incrementally introduced alongside more obviously revenue-focused initiatives, for example, as essential support projects for digital or AI transformations.  

Standard practice: Renegotiate project cycles or ask for additional resources

New projects don’t always offer the opportunity to bundle, so another strategy for keeping IT projects active is to run them at a slower pace. This will push back project timelines and likely affect the number of personnel you can keep on those projects — but at least the projects will stay active.

But it’s essential to present to upper management and stakeholders the impact that will be felt in projects placed on a slower track — and to renegotiate timelines and deliverables. The conversation would go like this: “I understand the urgency of new project ABC, but to do it, we will need to shift resources. This impacts the delivery of project XYZ, which will be delayed until [some future point in time].”

It’s important to get management’s buy-in on this, and to document the agreement on adjusted timelines in writing. An alternate approach if management still wants the original project to stay on schedule is to ask for the additional resources needed to do both the new and original projects without altering timelines or deliverables.

Fail-safe: Put projects on hold and reevaluate the business shift’s IT impact

If strategic IT projects can’t be sustained due to new business priorities, the original projects will need to be placed on hold or be reevaluated for relevance to determine whether the business shift puts the project far away from original goals.

When business strategies shift dramatically, the entire IT strategic plan may require revision.

If the business shift and its impact on IT are so extreme that the IT strategic plan requires revision, it’s time to get in front of the board, stakeholders, upper management, and staff to explain how the business shift impacts IT strategy, and how IT strategy and priorities will need to shift, too.

CIOs like to avoid this drastic step, because when you start realigning strategies and changing direction, it not only affects the flow of strategy; it also has the potential to undermine the morale of your staff, who, if they see priorities constantly shifting, will begin to wonder how strategically sound their management is.

There are several things CIOs can do to help insulate themselves from sudden business shifts that can impact IT strategy.

First, if you must defer projects, place them “on hold,” and don’t outright cancel them. The exception to this is if a project truly becomes irrelevant because of a business development — for example, you’d planned to upgrade your ERP system, but you’ve just learned your company is getting acquired by another company and you will be moving to that company’s ERP system instead.

Second, when possible, structure projects with shorter timelines that can be deployed quickly. By containerizing infrastructure components, writing more applications using agile methodologies, low-code and no-code tools, and the tools and methodologies of your vendors, it’s possible to do some of this. It also gives projects in motion at the time of a business shift a better shot at finishing.


Read More from This Article: How IT leaders can say yes without killing projects — or their careers
Source: News

Category: NewsMay 13, 2025
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:AI’s next big thing is here: how QCT and NVIDIA drive agentic AI useNextNext post:NVIDIA powers QCT GenAI Dev Kit to accelerate customized GenAI use cases

Related posts

INE Security Alert: Top 5 Takeaways from RSAC 2025
May 13, 2025
Leading high-performance engineering teams: Lessons from mission-critical systems
May 13, 2025
HUMAIN: Saudi Arabia’s bold bet on sovereign AI and Arabic LLMs
May 13, 2025
AWS ofrece un adelanto de lo que los CIO pueden hacer con Amazon Q Business
May 13, 2025
Product or feature? A key AI debate could leave CIO strategies in limbo
May 13, 2025
La CNMC pone el foco sobre la IA y la inteligencia de negocios
May 13, 2025
Recent Posts
  • INE Security Alert: Top 5 Takeaways from RSAC 2025
  • Leading high-performance engineering teams: Lessons from mission-critical systems
  • HUMAIN: Saudi Arabia’s bold bet on sovereign AI and Arabic LLMs
  • AWS ofrece un adelanto de lo que los CIO pueden hacer con Amazon Q Business
  • Product or feature? A key AI debate could leave CIO strategies in limbo
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.