Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

How IT leaders can assess “secure-by-design” software claims

It’s no secret cyberthreats are increasing. The cost of reported cybercrime in the US jumped 22% last year to more than $12.5 billion, according to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center.1 One issue is weaknesses that have been preserved in software by traditional approaches to coding and security. To combat these risks, there is now a concerted effort to create software that is secure by design. For example, the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has outlined a set of actions vendors can take to prove they are adopting secure by design the principles.2

But without enforceable standards and metrics, it’s difficult for IT and security leaders to assess whether and how vendors are carrying out this secure by design approach. Here are some steps you can take.

Incorporate secure by design practices into risk assessments

Vendor risk assessment is a standard process by which enterprises identify and evaluate the potential hazards associated with a vendor’s products and operations. IT and security leaders can use this process to focus on secure by design principles and practices, says Michael Riemer, Field Chief Information Security Officer, for Ivanti.

“For us, as a software vendor, it means taking full responsibility for our own products,” Riemer says. “You look at the solution’s entire architecture and consider security in all areas, such as architecture design, storage, connectivity, usage, and so on.”

As part of the risk assessment, enterprises should also consider requiring a SOC 2 Type 2 report. This type of assessment provides more assurance about how a vendor protects customer data and information. It entails a third-party cybersecurity audit that assesses how the vendor’s internal security controls and practices work over an extended period of time.

Here are some key questions every vendor should be able to answer:

  • How often do you do penetration testing?
  • What types of penetration testing are done?
  • Do you perform both static and dynamic code analysis?

Evaluate coding practices

Traditional coding practices are sequential: one team works on a module, then hands it off to the next team and so on. But this preserves weaknesses that are introduced to the code base, says Ivanti’s Riemer.  By restructuring teams into “pods” or groups, each with a dedicated security architect, weaknesses can be weeded out from the start. This was a major change for Ivanti, says Riemer. Suppliers should be able to demonstrate these organizational changes and new practices.

Assess the secure by design transparency

Vendors should be able to publicly disclose their secure by design goals, and show that they are or will be reporting metrics on a regular basis. Customers should also be able to track the vendor’s progress through its software modules.

“We’ve created specific goals, established a baseline and metrics, and will publish quarterly updates of these metrics starting in October 2024,” says Riemer. “We’re holding ourselves accountable for our secure by design progress. These metrics will show what software modules we’ve analyzed and how deep the analyses have gone in identifying and rectifying weak coding practices.”

The bottom line

Business and IT leaders can use the principles of secure by design to assess the progress made of their software suppliers in creating code that is inherently more secure. Secure by design enables these leaders to minimize business risks.

Click here to find out more about Ivanti’s commitment to secure product design.


1 2023_IC3Report.pdf

2 Shifting the Balance of Cybersecurity Risk: Principles and Approaches for Secure by Design Software (cisa.gov)


 


Read More from This Article:
How IT leaders can assess “secure-by-design” software claims
Source: News

Category: NewsOctober 24, 2024
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Google Cloud chief moves to ServiceNow as COONextNext post:How CIOs and CISOs can partner to improve workforce productivity and security

Related posts

휴먼컨설팅그룹, HR 솔루션 ‘휴넬’ 업그레이드 발표
May 9, 2025
Epicor expands AI offerings, launches new green initiative
May 9, 2025
MS도 합류··· 구글의 A2A 프로토콜, AI 에이전트 분야의 공용어 될까?
May 9, 2025
오픈AI, 아시아 4국에 데이터 레지던시 도입··· 한국 기업 데이터는 한국 서버에 저장
May 9, 2025
SAS supercharges Viya platform with AI agents, copilots, and synthetic data tools
May 8, 2025
IBM aims to set industry standard for enterprise AI with ITBench SaaS launch
May 8, 2025
Recent Posts
  • 휴먼컨설팅그룹, HR 솔루션 ‘휴넬’ 업그레이드 발표
  • Epicor expands AI offerings, launches new green initiative
  • MS도 합류··· 구글의 A2A 프로토콜, AI 에이전트 분야의 공용어 될까?
  • 오픈AI, 아시아 4국에 데이터 레지던시 도입··· 한국 기업 데이터는 한국 서버에 저장
  • SAS supercharges Viya platform with AI agents, copilots, and synthetic data tools
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.