Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

How Birmingham’s $48M Oracle ERP project turned into an epic failure

Birmingham City Council’s (BCC) troubled enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, built on Oracle software, has become a case study of how large-scale IT projects can go awry. The system, intended to streamline payments and HR processes, is now “unlikely” to function correctly before 2026 — four years after its 2022 launch.

The project involved replacing the city council’s long-standing SAP system with Oracle Cloud.

The catastrophic failure of the project, which has ballooned from an initial $48 million (£38 million) investment to an estimated $114 million (£90 million) after including re-implementation costs, stands as a stark reminder of how large-scale enterprise software projects can spiral out of control.

In a damning audit report, Grant Thornton has exposed how the project implementation turned into a cautionary tale of project mismanagement, highlighting critical failures in governance, technical oversight, and vendor management that continue to impact the council’s core operations.

According to the report, the implementation has “fundamentally impacted the Council’s financial management and its operations,” forcing the council into a costly re-implementation phase that has more than doubled the project’s original budget.

Cost overruns and delays: where did it go wrong?

The audit revealed that the project’s budget ballooned from an initial £19 million to over £90 million, with delays pushing the system’s full functionality to 2026—four years beyond the planned 2022 launch.

“Integration with Oracle’s systems proved more complex than expected, leading to prolonged testing and spiraling costs,” the report stated. Payroll integration issues, combined with the volume and quality of data migration, required extensive retesting, further inflating costs.

BCC’s heavy reliance on Oracle and external consultants became a double-edged sword. While third-party expertise was essential, it also weakened internal control over the project’s financial and operational outcomes.

“The council’s reliance on external support undermined financial controls and increased costs,” the audit noted. Licensing and customization fees added further strain to the budget.

The governance-expertise gap

The investigation uncovered a governance structure plagued by fundamental weaknesses.  At the heart of Birmingham’s ERP crisis lies what we might term the “governance-expertise gap” – a critical disconnect between oversight responsibilities and technical understanding. The absence of Oracle expertise within the council’s digital department created a dangerous scenario where those responsible for governance lacked the technical foundation to evaluate and challenge their implementation partners effectively.

This governance-expertise gap manifested primarily through the council’s inability to function as an “intelligent customer,” which severely compromised their capacity to manage and direct their system integration partner, EvoSys.

Moreover, the lack of technical oversight led to the acceptance of extensive customizations that violated their own “adopt not adapt” principle, accepting extensive customizations to align with existing business processes based on their legacy SAP system. Change requests affecting critical aspects of the solution were accepted late in the implementation cycle, creating unnecessary complexity and risk.

The council’s approach to governance showed a startling lack of independent oversight. Despite the program’s complexity and critical nature, no review was undertaken by Internal Audit until just before go-live.

When this review finally occurred and identified key issues, its findings were ignored, highlighting a systemic failure in the council’s risk management approach, the report added.

Grant Thornton’s is not the first audit report to question the systemic flaws involved in the ERP implementation. There are multiple reports including one from a manager at BCC highlighting the discrepancies at the Council, way back in June 2023.

Vendor management crisis

The relationship with system integration partner EvoSys exemplifies the project’s troubled vendor management. Despite providing a senior director to advise council officers and recommending go-live, EvoSys’s actual contribution to program discussions appears minimal in meeting minutes and other documentation.

A particular point of concern centers on the custom Bank Reconciliation System (BRS). The system has not functioned effectively since implementation, with the council identifying posting errors in April 2022.

However, EvoSys claims they weren’t informed of these issues until January 2023, after their support contract had ended, highlighting serious communication breakdowns between the council and its key vendor.

Culture of silence and suppression

Perhaps most concerning is the report’s revelation of a pervasive culture where “bad news was not welcome.”

The audit found that reporting consistently presented an optimistic view, burying serious risks and challenges in supporting materials where they were less likely to attract attention or scrutiny.

Staff concerns were systematically downplayed or ignored. The report notes that “concerns raised went unheard or were downplayed” across all levels, from members and staff to the program team.

This culture of suppression prevented early identification and mitigation of serious issues that later proved catastrophic.

Change management: The overlooked critical path

The council’s approach to change management reveals a common misconception in enterprise software implementations – treating user training and stakeholder engagement as secondary considerations rather than critical path items.

This manifested through training programs that didn’t reflect the actual system configuration, combined with late engagement of key stakeholder groups and insufficient attention to business process changes.

Technical expertise must be embedded within governance structures, not relegated to merely advisory roles. Cultural transformation should precede technical transformation, while vendor relationships require structured communication frameworks and clear accountability measures. Change management deserves elevation to a primary project workstream.

The project’s setbacks have had far-reaching consequences.  The council’s financial position was already strained, with ERP costs contributing to its September 2023 bankruptcy declaration.

Opposition leaders have been vocal in their criticism.

“This was an abdication of responsibility on a grand scale, with costs once again falling on Birmingham residents,” BBC reported quoting Robert Alden, leader of the Birmingham Local Conservatives. Taxes are set to increase by 7.49% from April 2024, adding to the public backlash, the report added.

The re-implementation challenge

Birmingham’s current re-implementation effort presents an interesting test case for these principles. The success or failure of this second attempt will likely depend on whether the council can address not just the technical issues, but the deeper organizational and cultural patterns that contributed to the initial failure.

While the road to full ERP functionality remains long, BCC is working to address the issues identified in the audit.

“We have significantly strengthened governance, addressed system issues, and are committed to learning from past mistakes,” BBC reported quoting a council spokesperson.

As public sector organizations increasingly adopt digital solutions, the lessons from BCC’s ERP implementation serve as a reminder that success requires not only advanced technology but also effective governance, skilled project management, and realistic expectations.


Read More from This Article: How Birmingham’s M Oracle ERP project turned into an epic failure
Source: News

Category: NewsFebruary 21, 2025
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:최형광 칼럼 | 딥시크가 촉발하는 AI 패권 경쟁NextNext post:AI humanoid robots inch their way toward the workforce

Related posts

Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
May 30, 2025
Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
May 30, 2025
The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
May 30, 2025
Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
May 30, 2025
“AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
May 30, 2025
“ROI는 어디에?” AI 도입을 재고하게 만드는 실패 사례
May 30, 2025
Recent Posts
  • Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
  • Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
  • The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
  • Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
  • “AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.