Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

Former OpenAI board member tells all about Altman’s ousting

A former board member of OpenAI has shed new light on last year’s firing of company CEO Sam Altman.

In an episode of The Ted AI Show podcast titled What really went down at OpenAI and the future of regulation, Helen Toner spoke with host Bilawal Sidhu about Altman’s departure and subsequent return, as well as the need for sound and thorough AI regulation — an issue of paramount importance for CIOs, who not only need to deal with AI governance in the enterprise, but must also be able to trust the technologies they are using.

In introducing Toner, the director of strategy and foundational research grants at Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) and an expert in AI policy and global AI strategy, Sidhu described the OpenAI saga as being “all about AI board governance and incentives being misaligned among some really smart people. It also shows us why trusting tech companies to govern themselves may not always go beautifully, which is why we need external rules and regulations. It is a balance.”

As for what really went down, Toner described the OpenAI board, which she joined in 2021, “as not a normal board.” It was, she said, set up explicitly for the purpose of making sure the company’s public good mission was coming first over profits and investor interests. and was one of four board members to vote for Altman’s dismissal before being ousted upon his return a week later,

“But for years, Sam had made it really difficult for the board to actually do that job by withholding information, misrepresenting things that were happening at the company and in some cases, outright lying to the board. At this point, everyone always says, ‘Like what? Give me give me some examples,’” she said.

“I cannot share all the examples,” she continued, “but to give a sense of the kind of thing that I am talking about, it is things like, when ChatGPT came out in November 2022, the board was not informed in advance. We learned about it on Twitter. Sam did not inform the board that he owned the OpenAI Startup Fund, even though he constantly was claiming to be an independent board member with no financial interest in the company.”

In addition, she said, “On multiple occasions, he gave us inaccurate information about the small number of formal safety processes that the company did have in place, meaning that it was basically impossible for the board to know how well those safety processes were working or what might need to change.”

The final example she said she could share, “because it’s been very widely reported, relates to this paper that I wrote, which, I think, has been way overplayed in the press.”

Sidhu told his audience that Toner co-wrote a research paper last fall intended for policy makers: “What you need to know is that Sam Altman was not happy about it. It seemed like Helen’s paper was critical of open AI and more positive about one of their competitors, Anthropic. It was also published right when the Federal Trade Commission was investigating OpenAI about the data used to build its generative AI products.”

Toner replied that the problem was that, “after the paper came out, Sam started lying to other board members in order to try and push me off the board. So, it was another example that just like really damaged our ability to trust him and actually only happened in late October last year, when we were already talking pretty seriously about whether we needed to fire him.”

Toner one of four board members to vote for Altman’s dismissal in November 2023, before being ousted herself upon his return a week later,

The OpenAI saga, said Sidhu, “shows that trying to do good and regulating yourself is not enough.” He then asked Toner why it is necessary to have regulations.

Toner said that they are imperative by virtue of the fact AI can be used in so many scenarios, be it in an IT department or a government agency.

“If people are using it to decide who gets a loan, to decide who gets parole, to decide who gets to buy a house, you need that technology to work well. If that technology is going to be discriminatory, which AI often is, it turns out, you need to make sure that people have recourse, and they can go back and say, ‘Hey, why was this decision made?’” she said.

As for the possibility of AI being used in the military, she said, “That is a whole other kettle of fish. I do not know if we would say ‘regulation’ for that, but we certainly need to have guidance, rules, and processes in place.”

Another concern is “superalignment,” or ensuring that superintelligent AI systems remain aligned with human values and goals. OpenAI had a whole team dedicated to that, led by former Chief Scientist Ilya Sutskever, who left the company two weeks ago, and Jan Leike, who left OpenAI to join Anthropic in a similar role.

Reflecting on the risks that could arise from the development of superintelligent AI without adequate safeguards, Toner said, “Looking forward and thinking about more advanced AI systems, there is a pretty wide range of potential harms that we could well see if AI keeps getting increasingly sophisticated. A script kiddy in their parent’s basement having the hacking capabilities of a crack NSA cell is a problem.”

Sidhu concluded the podcast by reading a statement from OpenAI board chairman Bret Taylor, to whom he had sent a transcript of the episode. Taylor wrote, “We are disappointed that Miss Toner continues to revisit these issues. An independent committee of the board worked with the law firm WilmerHale to conduct an extensive review of the events of November. The review concluded that the prior board’s decision was not based on concerns of product safety or security, the pace of development, OpenAI’s finances, or its statements to investors, customers, or business partners. Additionally, over 95% of employees, including senior leadership, asked for Sam’s reinstatement as CEO and the resignation of the prior board. Our focus remains on moving forward and pursuing OpenAI’s mission to ensure AGI benefits all of humanity.”


Read More from This Article: Former OpenAI board member tells all about Altman’s ousting
Source: News

Category: NewsMay 29, 2024
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:今日のITリーダーが真っ先に思い浮かべる10のプロジェクトNextNext post:Applying AI for sales growth: Where to start & how to scale

Related posts

Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
May 30, 2025
Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
May 30, 2025
The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
May 30, 2025
Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
May 30, 2025
“AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
May 30, 2025
“ROI는 어디에?” AI 도입을 재고하게 만드는 실패 사례
May 30, 2025
Recent Posts
  • Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
  • Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
  • The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
  • Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
  • “AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.