Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

Federal judge strikes down FTC’s ban on non-compete agreements

A federal judge in Texas ordered the US Federal Trade Commission to not enforce its partial ban on non-compete agreements on Tuesday, agreeing with the Chamber of Commerce that the FTC move “exceeded its statutory authority,” was “arbitrary and capricious” and that the proposed FTC rule would have caused businesses “irreparable harm.”

The ruling was highly anticipated because the same judge in July temporarily suspended the rule.

The FTC is “seriously considering a potential appeal,” it said in a statement.

That appeal would likely go to the US Supreme Court, but that court’s recent decision setting aside the so-called Chevron deference makes observers suppose that the court won’t side with the FTC.

“Regardless of when the FTC appeals, the Supreme Court’s recent Loper Bright decision handed down on June 28, 2024, is expected to make an FTC appeal or ultimate success on the merits more challenging,” said an analysis of the case posted by the White & Case law firm. “Loper Bright overruled long-standing precedent under which courts afford deference to a federal agency’s interpretation of its own power, known as Chevron deference. Without Chevron deference now, the FTC’s legal arguments in support of its authority to promulgate the rule are on equal footing as the plaintiffs arguing that the FTC overstepped.”

The FTC on Wednesday said it was exploring two ways to try and continue fighting against non-compete agreements.

“We are seriously considering a potential appeal and today’s decision does not prevent the FTC from addressing noncompetes through case-by-case enforcement actions,” said FTC spokesperson Victoria Graham. 

But another FTC official, who asked to not be identified, said that an appeal could be based on conflicting rulings from two federal courts. 

On Aug. 14, a Florida federal judge came to the same conclusion that the Texas federal judge did in blocking the non-compete rule. But on July 23, a federal judge in Pennsylvania went the other way and ruled that the FTC was correct in issuing the non-compete rule. 

The FTC source cited the conflicting rulings as the justification for an appeal. 

In the decision handed down by US District Judge Ada Brown in Dallas, the judge said that the power to regulate such matters rests with either the states or congress and not a federal commission. 

“States have statutory provisions or case law that ban or limit the enforceability of non-competes for workers in certain specified occupations. No federal law broadly addresses the enforceability of non-competes,” the judge wrote. “By a plain reading, [Congress] does not expressly grant the commission authority to promulgate substantive rules regarding unfair methods of competition.”

The judge added that the FTC may have limited authority to make such rules, but that the FTC went too far. “The Court concludes the FTC has some authority to promulgate rules to preclude unfair methods of competition. Indeed, the Act alludes to this power in Section 18. However, after reviewing the text, structure, and history of the act, the Court concludes the FTC lacks the authority to create substantive rules through this method.”

“The Commission’s lack of evidence as to why they chose to impose such a sweeping prohibition—that prohibits entering or enforcing virtually all non-competes — instead of targeting specific, harmful non-competes, renders the Rule arbitrary and capricious,” the judge wrote. 

Also, the court ruled, “the lack of a penalty included with Section 6(g) supports that such provision encompasses only housekeeping rules—not substantive rulemaking power.” He added: “Agencies are creatures of Congress. The Court must look to what Congress explicitly gave the FTC the authority to do. The Court concludes that the structure and the location of Section 6(g) indicate that Congress did not explicitly give the Commission substantive rulemaking authority.”


Read More from This Article: Federal judge strikes down FTC’s ban on non-compete agreements
Source: News

Category: NewsAugust 21, 2024
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:ハッカソンを成功させる秘訣NextNext post:Meter Command: the modern network interface

Related posts

Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
May 30, 2025
Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
May 30, 2025
The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
May 30, 2025
Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
May 30, 2025
“AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
May 30, 2025
“ROI는 어디에?” AI 도입을 재고하게 만드는 실패 사례
May 30, 2025
Recent Posts
  • Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
  • Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
  • The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
  • Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
  • “AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.