Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

Dump the RFP to reap better outsourcing results

Every day, hundreds of organizations conduct competitive bids to pick the best supplier to meet their needs. But what happens when they rely on the wrong tools to do so?

A common pitfall is what University of Tennessee researchers have coined the Outsourcing Paradox — which is when a buying organization procures goods or services from a supplier expected to be the expert and then tells them how to do the work. Innovation stagnates because specifics defined in the tender process restrain suppliers.

The conventional approach to bidding has been a Request for Price/Quote and a Request for Proposal. Advances in standardized and automated bidding systems aimed at speeding up the supplier selection process often creates an inherent perverse incentive where the buyer gets what they asked for in the bid — not necessarily what they needed. Why? Suppliers are forced to respond to predefined bid specifications and lack the opportunity to have a more collaborative dialogue to help their clients get the best possible solution.

Understanding competitive bid methods

There are six common types of competitive bid methods in practice today, ranging from highly competitive and arm’s length in nature (an e-auction) to highly collaborative (request for partner) as shown in the figure below.

Continuum of RFx Approaches

Kate Vitasek / University of Tennessee

A University of Tennessee white paper — Unpacking Competitive Bidding Methods: The Essential ABCs of the Various RFX Methods — provides insight into the what, why, and how of the most popular bid methods.

The below highlights the less used but highly powerful collaborative bidding methods known as a Request for Solution and a Request for Partner and how they can help organizations get more value out of their bid process.

Request for solution 

A Request for Solution starts with the buyer coming to the table with background information, data, and characteristics of the existing environment, measurable outcomes, and an outline of the long-term vision. For example, they transparently share information such as:

  • Business goals and objectives
  • A description of the desired supplier output or business outcomes
  • Any known or perceived constraints
  • High-level existing operating data to provide a general landscape of the current situation

Think of a Request for Solution as the buyer presenting the supplier with a puzzle, and the supplier’s job is to propose the best way for the buyer to solve the puzzle.

Embracing a collaborative Request for Solution model transforms the procurement journey by incorporating a supplier “dialogue” phase where the buyer and supplier collaborate on the best possible solution. A Request for Solution invites suppliers to share their unique expertise and aligns buyers and suppliers towards a shared aspiration, instead of merely adhering to predefined specifications.

Stepping into this model means inviting suppliers to step up and present innovative solutions tailored to the buyer’s needs. This collaboration sparks during dynamic workshops, turning problem-solving into a harmonious creative process.

A Request for Solution still ends with the same goal as more traditional bid processes — picking a supplier. But the collaborative process helps align the supplier’s understand of what the buyer needs while opening the eyes of the buyer to how various suppliers can best meet their need. Procurement shifts from being a transaction to one of being a partner, bringing buyers and suppliers closer to mutual success and growth.

Request for partner

A Request for Partner layers in all the key collaborative features of the Request for Solution method but adds a critical dimension: It stresses the importance of finding a supplier that will be a good “fit” for their organization. The definition of “fit” depends on the needs of the buying organization but often includes evaluating suppliers on facets such as cultural compatibility, commitment to a transparent pricing model, or flexibility. 

The Request for Partner process is best suited when the buying organization is seeking a highly strategic and collaborative longer-term business relationship. It is an excellent choice for complex outsourcing deals where the buyer and supplier will need to work closely together, and it is essential the parties view teaming, collaboration, and transparency through the same lens.  

From the outset, a Request for Partner process emphasizes a long-term perspective. As part of the process, the buyer hosts collaborative workshops where the buyer and supplier’s team members not only collaborate on the potential solution (like the Request for Solution) they also collaborate to incorporate formal relational contracting techniques such as developing a shared vision, guiding principles, and governance mechanisms.

Because the Request for Partner process is used for your most strategic supplier relationships, you should be ready to invest the proper amount of stakeholder involvement into the process to ensure you can yield the highest long-term rewards if successful.

Why you should make the shift to collaborative bidding

Traditional specification and price-focused approaches have been effective tools in enabling competitive pricing for tens — if not hundreds — of years. To date, organizations and software technology firms have invested millions of dollars perfecting highly competitive bid process to get to a successful transaction quicker and cheaper. But research shows that transaction-based approaches have limited ability to create value for an organization and only work optimally when there is abundant supply and low complexity where the “market” can correct itself.

Why do transaction-based approaches fall short for more strategic relationships? It is because they create a catch-22: Both buyers and service providers want innovation but neither wants to make the investment necessary to do so due to the transactional nature of their relationship.

Alternative delivery models such as Vested outsourcing are helping organizations break away from a transaction treadmill by creating highly collaborative win-win relational contracts with shared risk/shared reward economic models incentivizing suppliers for investing in mutually defined desired outcomes that create value for both buyers and suppliers. But getting there requires buyers to bring collaboration into the actual bid process to unlock the potential of how the parties can create value.

The bottom line

Complex sourcing initiatives demand nuanced and collaborative bidding strategies. If you want more collaboration from your suppliers, try starting with a more collaborative bid process.

Outsourcing


Read More from This Article: Dump the RFP to reap better outsourcing results
Source: News

Category: NewsApril 29, 2024
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Top 10 barriers to strategic IT successNextNext post:CIO100 Awards ASEAN

Related posts

휴먼컨설팅그룹, HR 솔루션 ‘휴넬’ 업그레이드 발표
May 9, 2025
Epicor expands AI offerings, launches new green initiative
May 9, 2025
MS도 합류··· 구글의 A2A 프로토콜, AI 에이전트 분야의 공용어 될까?
May 9, 2025
오픈AI, 아시아 4국에 데이터 레지던시 도입··· 한국 기업 데이터는 한국 서버에 저장
May 9, 2025
SAS supercharges Viya platform with AI agents, copilots, and synthetic data tools
May 8, 2025
IBM aims to set industry standard for enterprise AI with ITBench SaaS launch
May 8, 2025
Recent Posts
  • 휴먼컨설팅그룹, HR 솔루션 ‘휴넬’ 업그레이드 발표
  • Epicor expands AI offerings, launches new green initiative
  • MS도 합류··· 구글의 A2A 프로토콜, AI 에이전트 분야의 공용어 될까?
  • 오픈AI, 아시아 4국에 데이터 레지던시 도입··· 한국 기업 데이터는 한국 서버에 저장
  • SAS supercharges Viya platform with AI agents, copilots, and synthetic data tools
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.