Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

Does it matter how we brand IT, or are bigger questions afoot?

Recently, there’s been a flurry of LinkedIn activity in response to an article by IT Brew reporter Brianna Monsanto about the value of an IT department name change. The general conclusion from the article, and ensuing discussion, is that while changing IT’s name can be a good move, it’s merely a branding element in what needs to be a wholesale reengineering of the team. If you feel the need to change the name of your IT organization, you probably have bigger problems. Or, as I put it in the article, putting lipstick on a pig isn’t going to help. You have to actually change that animal.

The current interest in this topic calls to mind a section on rebranding IT in my 2012 book The CIO Paradox, proving once again that everything old is new again and that the CIO Paradox persists. In it, a CIO I interviewed said: “When I was at GE, we did rename IT. While I had no objections to this rebranding effort, I don’t think it’s central to the success of any IT organization.” 

Back in 2012, rebranding IT was the right conversation. IT’s goals of enablement, support, and alignment would be well served by some gentle reorganization around business relationship managers and a shiny new name. (Digital Technologies! Business Solutions! Ministry of Funny Walks!) But today, we need to have a different conversation. The ground has shifted dramatically since then that renaming IT is almost a moot point.

Let’s think back a couple hundred years when we were all farmers in this country. Then, around 1786, a new technology, the steam engine, was invented, and farm girls moved to mill cities, robber barons got rich, and we ushered in 200 years of the Industrial Age, with the 19th century seeing more innovation than any other era to date. Carnegie, Vanderbilt, Astor, and the rest built empires on expansive plots of real estate, owned assets and big teams, and constructed moats around their businesses to stay competitive.

Then sometime in the 1960s, we had another invention: software, which has been driving the evolution of business ever since. And because of software, companies tend to want consolidated real estate, a smaller owned asset footprint, small nimble teams, and API-enabled connections right into their partners’ tech platforms.

This is a new economy, a data economy, where industrial management practices and ideologies no longer apply. In the data economy, where our future growth is only as good as our data strategy, culture, and infrastructure, we need to run our businesses very differently. This means ultimately remodeling the entire organization, including IT.  

Bigger questions

So before we ask what to call IT, we need to ask what value a technology team brings to a business in the data economy. But before that, we need to ask what the AI tsunami headed our way means for big companies still stuck in industrial mode — that is, almost all of them. Will our human difficulty with change derail our AI adoption odyssey and create a massive disparity in data version legacy business? Are we on the verge of a slew of Blockbuster death stories? Based on recent news about China’s DeepSeek giving Nvidia a run for its money, what kind of wild global AI market ride are we all on?

These are the questions that technology leaders, who ironically have the most power to shape our rapidly changing human society, need to figure out before worrying about a name change.

But in the meantime, here are some name ideas: value creation, AI adoption, enterprise transformation. But there’s one I believe most accurately describes the impact that technology will have in the data economy. I call it IT.


Read More from This Article: Does it matter how we brand IT, or are bigger questions afoot?
Source: News

Category: NewsFebruary 7, 2025
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Iberdrola y AWS estrechan lazos: de la compra de energía verde a la nubeNextNext post:Repsol impulsa su estrategia digital con la incorporación de agentes de IA

Related posts

Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
May 30, 2025
Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
May 30, 2025
The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
May 30, 2025
“AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
May 30, 2025
“ROI는 어디에?” AI 도입을 재고하게 만드는 실패 사례
May 30, 2025
오픈AI는 ‘NO’, 아마존엔 ‘YES’···뉴욕타임스, AI 훈련용 데이터 첫 계약
May 30, 2025
Recent Posts
  • Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
  • Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
  • The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
  • “AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
  • “ROI는 어디에?” AI 도입을 재고하게 만드는 실패 사례
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.