Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

CIOs are worried about the informal rise of generative AI in the enterprise

In my previous column in May, when I wrote about generative AI uses and the cybersecurity risks they could pose, CISOs noted that their organizations hadn’t deployed many (if any) generative AI-based solutions at scale.

What a difference a few months makes. Now, generative AI use has infiltrated the enterprise with tools and platforms like OpenAI’s ChatGPT / DALL-E, Anthropic’s Claude.ai, Stable Diffusion, and others in ways both expected and unexpected.

In a recent post, McKinsey noted that generative AI is expected to have a “significant impact across all industry sectors.” As an example, the consultancy refers to how generative AI technology could potentially add $200 – $400 billion in added annual value to the banking industry if full implementation moves ahead on various use cases. The potential value across a broader spectrum of institutions could be enormous. But while organizations look to incorporate elements of generative AI to strengthen efficiency and productivity, others are worried about controlling its usage within the enterprise. 

Generative AI on the loose in enterprises

I contacted a range of world-leading CIOs, CISOs, and cybersecurity experts across industries to gather their take regarding the recent surge in the unmanaged usage of generative AI in company operations. Here’s what I learned.

Organizations are seeing a dramatic rise in informal adoption of gen AI – tools and platforms used without official sanctioning. Employees are using it to develop software, write code, create content, and prepare sales and marketing plans. A few months ago, monitoring these unsanctioned uses was not on a CISO’s list of to-dos. Today, it is, as they create a mysterious new risk and attack surface to defend against.

One cybersecurity expert told me, “Companies are unprepared for the influx of AI-based products today – from a people, process, or technology perspective. Furthermore, heightening the issue is that a lot of the adoption of AI is not visible at the product level but at a contractual level. There are no regulations around disclosure of ‘AI Inside.’”

Another CISO told me that his primary concerns included the potential for IP infringement and data poisoning. He also identified technologies to secure the AI engines and workflows used by the company (or its 3rd party partners) that support creative content development.

A high-level CISO in capital management feared “plagiarism, biased information impacting decisions or recommendations, data loss to numerous organizations, and reliance and economic waste on products that don’t prove short or medium value.”

One CIO executive told me that his most significant concern right now is having their proprietary data or content incorporated into the training set (or information-retrieval repository) of a third-party product to then be presented as a work product of that company.

Privacy leaks?

Among the respondents, the clear message was that companies fear unintended data leakage. A CISO at a major marketing software firm worried about this explicitly, stating, “The real risk is that you have unintentional data leakage of confidential information. People send things into ChatGPT that they shouldn’t, now stored in ChatGPT servers. Maybe it gets used in modeling. Maybe it then winds up getting exposed. So I think the real risk here is the exposure of sensitive information. We have to ask ourselves, “Is that data being adequately protected or not?”

Another respondent provided a recent example of an engineer trying to send a source code snippet up to ChatGPT that included an API key in it. While they were able to detect the issue, in general, this could be very dangerous. Not all companies have security systems that can detect, block, or remediate this type of behavior.

Another information security executive cited Samsung’s temporary ban of ChatGPT in its systems. The electronics company learned the hard way that content input into ChatGPT’s prompt can be viewed publicly. In this case, the input contained the source code of software responsible for the company’s semiconductor equipment. What followed was a knee-jerk reaction to ban ChatGPT.

Controlling the Gen AI outbreak

What can CISOs and corporate security experts do to put some sort of limits on this AI outbreak? One executive said that it’s essential to toughen up basic security measures like “a combination of access control, CASB/proxy/application firewalls/SASE, data protection, and data loss protection.”

Another CIO pointed to reading and implementing some of the concrete steps offered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework report. Senior leaders must recognize that risk is inherent in generative AI usage in the enterprise, and proper risk mitigation procedures are likely to evolve.

Still, another respondent mentioned that in their company, generative AI usage policies have been incorporated into employee training modules, and that policy is straightforward to access and read. The person added, “In every vendor/client relationship we secure with GenAI providers, we ensure that the terms of the service have explicit language about the data and content we use as input not being folded into the training foundation of the 3rd party service.”

Corporate governance and regulatory requirements

And what about corporate governance and regulatory requirements? What can organizations do in this area? One of the CISOs surveyed suggested that executive boards should determine what governance practices should be established to maximize the benefits of generative AI against the potential risk and legal/regulatory requirements.

In a nutshell, the same executive provided the following checklist:

  • Organizational awareness of existing and in-development legal and regulatory requirements
  • Clearly identified roles and governance processes required to map, measure, and manage AI risks. This includes documentation of the risks and potential impacts of AI technology.
  • Identification/discovery mechanisms to inventory AI systems
  • Processes to address the AI lifecycle for development, implementation, and end-of-life software
  • Development of policies and procedures for addressing third-party and supply-chain risks that leverage AI
  • Processes to address failures or incidents in AI systems

In summary, enterprise employees are working with AI tools, with or without the corporate blessing for such use. To help rein in what could be a widespread information leak or other significant damaging incident, CIOs, CISOs, and their corporations need to control generative AI use in the organization.

They will need to determine whether this takes shape in the form of greater adherence to existing corporate security measures, augmenting these, and/or finding new forms of internal controls on employee use of third-party vendors.

In my next article, I’ll share some processes to manage and remediate the use of generative AI in enterprise organizations. Stay tuned!

Artificial Intelligence, Generative AI
Read More from This Article: CIOs are worried about the informal rise of generative AI in the enterprise
Source: News

Category: NewsAugust 30, 2023
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Giant Eagle CIO Kirk Ball’s recipe for digital transformation successNextNext post:The portfolio approach to digital transformation: 4 keys to success

Related posts

Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
May 30, 2025
Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
May 30, 2025
The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
May 30, 2025
Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
May 30, 2025
“AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
May 30, 2025
“ROI는 어디에?” AI 도입을 재고하게 만드는 실패 사례
May 30, 2025
Recent Posts
  • Barb Wixom and MIT CISR on managing data like a product
  • Avery Dennison takes culture-first approach to AI transformation
  • The agentic AI assist Stanford University cancer care staff needed
  • Los desafíos de la era de la ‘IA en todas partes’, a fondo en Data & AI Summit 2025
  • “AI 비서가 팀 단위로 지원하는 효과”···퍼플렉시티, AI 프로젝트 10분 완성 도구 ‘랩스’ 출시
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.