Skip to content
Tiatra, LLCTiatra, LLC
Tiatra, LLC
Information Technology Solutions for Washington, DC Government Agencies
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact
 
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
    • IT Engineering and Support
    • Software Development
    • Information Assurance and Testing
    • Project and Program Management
  • Clients & Partners
  • Careers
  • News
  • Contact

6 ways CIOs sabotage their IT consultant’s success

Once upon a time my consulting company offered a “Take the Blame” service. Our pricing varied with what we were to take the blame for, from a few thousand dollars for small project failures to several million when an enterprise software implementation was going south.

Understand, this service wasn’t for situations where we were at fault. It was for situations where our client was at fault and needed a convenient scapegoat. Our logic: As consultants we’d probably be blamed anyway. This way we could at least turn a profit on it. Strangely, we had no takers. A few chuckles, but no takers.

Consultants do make convenient scapegoats. But really, wouldn’t it be better for everyone if they succeeded in their efforts so you don’t need a scapegoat? It’s a self-answering question, which leads to the next question: Why don’t more IT organizations do their best to help make this happen, instead of sabotaging the folks who should be their best allies with undercuts like what follows?

Flighty assumptions

Consulting contracts or statements of work include a section titled “Assumptions.” It’s a list of conditions that must be true for the project to succeed — everything from the client staff needed to work on the project, to the client sponsor having sufficient authority to negotiate contract changes should they be necessary.

Often, it turns out that many of the assumptions included in the contract were wishful thinking, jettisoned with the first project speed bump, leaving the consultant to decide whether to: (1) walk away from the impending mess immediately; (2) hang on in order to bill as much revenue as possible while the situation slowly erodes; or (3) formally document the assumption changes and insist on renegotiating the contract based on them.

Recommended project management practices would suggest door #3. If you want the project to succeed, #3 it is. But #3 is often politically impossible.

What to do? Now that it’s too late to do things the right way, CIOs can at least muddy the waters enough for everyone to come out whole by asking the consultant’s project manager what it will cost to make the worst-violated assumptions true enough for everyone to muddle through.

Information underload

That’s assumptions in general. Here’s a promise made during negotiations that’s often DOA once the project starts: The client will provide the consultant with the information necessary for the project to move forward. Of course, once the project starts, it turns out that nobody in the client organization can provide that information.

Why would the client make a promise like this? One reason: Whoever in the client organization is responsible for providing the information isn’t willing to admit that they can’t, either to their boss or to the consultants.

In the short term it’s safer to make the promise and kick the can down the road, until the project has been going on long enough to shift the blame to those damned consultants who keep on making unrealistic requests of IT staff who are already overworked and underpaid. (Take a deep breath.)

There’s another reason some clients can’t deliver information on demand: They’ve outsourced the IT functional area responsible for the information needed, and the outsourcer isn’t willing to help out consultants they see as likely competitors.

And for some unaccountable reason, many IT managers aren’t willing to tell the outsourcer that the “request” isn’t really a request in the sense of being optional. Providing the information is (well, should be) a condition of the outsource, assuming (there’s that word!) the outsourcer doesn’t want to become a former outsourcer.

Refusing to let the consultants consult

Consultants aren’t just supposed to be smart people. They’re supposed to provide expertise. That expertise includes frameworks, methodologies, and techniques. These aren’t three synonyms for the same subject, either: Frameworks organize knowledge; methodologies provide the means for collecting that knowledge; techniques are what are in the consultant’s bag o’ tricks — street-smarts that complement the book smarts of their frameworks and methodologies.

Some clients, not satisfied with specifying the results they’re looking for, also insist the consultants make use of the client’s templates, practices, and processes, even when they aren’t a good fit for the engagement; even when they’re the reason things have gone wrong — the reason the client needs consulting help in the first place.

Assigning the worst and dimmest

Consultants can’t succeed without active participation on the part of their client’s subject matter experts — the employees who know how to navigate the organization, whom to interview and receive briefings from, and who understand how things have been put together and how they operate (or are supposed to operate).

Smart clients assign their best and brightest employees to the consulting effort.

But these are the employees who are hardest to free up from their day-to-day work, and so less-wise clients often take the easy way out, assigning the employees who are easiest to do without.

Even the best consultants will have a hard time overcoming the limitations of subject matter experts who aren’t experts at all.

Grousing

Sometimes, and especially when a consulting engagement hits speed bumps, the temptation to badmouth the consulting team can be overwhelming.

That’s especially true when the consultants have been trying to overcome obstacles put into their path.

IT managers need to resist the temptation, for three reasons. First, everyone in earshot knows who chose the consultant in the first place. Second, not everyone in earshot will be naïve enough to accept one-sided blamestorming at face value.

Third, and most important: To succeed, consultants need client management’s cooperation in all areas and levels. Should IT succeed in discrediting the consultants it reduces everyone’s willingness to work with them.

Missing the point of post-negotiation work

It’s an uncontroversial truism that effective leaders and managers see their job as helping employees succeed.

For some unaccountable reason many IT leaders and managers don’t see their relationship with the consultants they bring in to complement their in-house expertise in the same light.

It’s true that outside consultants are more likely to have an intrinsic conflict of interest in the form of wanting to maximize margins and increase the scope of the work they take on.

But smart managers and leaders do everything they can to keep their consultant interactions on the right side of the line that separates collaboration from negotiation.

They understand that negotiation is what happens before the project starts. After that, if collaboration isn’t possible, it means you chose the wrong consultants.

Business IT Alignment, IT Consulting Services, IT Leadership, IT Strategy
Read More from This Article: 6 ways CIOs sabotage their IT consultant’s success
Source: News

Category: NewsAugust 8, 2023
Tags: art

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:Edge Computing: a powerful enabler for industrial frontline workersNextNext post:PepsiCo IT redefines direct-to-store business model success

Related posts

휴먼컨설팅그룹, HR 솔루션 ‘휴넬’ 업그레이드 발표
May 9, 2025
Epicor expands AI offerings, launches new green initiative
May 9, 2025
MS도 합류··· 구글의 A2A 프로토콜, AI 에이전트 분야의 공용어 될까?
May 9, 2025
오픈AI, 아시아 4국에 데이터 레지던시 도입··· 한국 기업 데이터는 한국 서버에 저장
May 9, 2025
SAS supercharges Viya platform with AI agents, copilots, and synthetic data tools
May 8, 2025
IBM aims to set industry standard for enterprise AI with ITBench SaaS launch
May 8, 2025
Recent Posts
  • 휴먼컨설팅그룹, HR 솔루션 ‘휴넬’ 업그레이드 발표
  • Epicor expands AI offerings, launches new green initiative
  • MS도 합류··· 구글의 A2A 프로토콜, AI 에이전트 분야의 공용어 될까?
  • 오픈AI, 아시아 4국에 데이터 레지던시 도입··· 한국 기업 데이터는 한국 서버에 저장
  • SAS supercharges Viya platform with AI agents, copilots, and synthetic data tools
Recent Comments
    Archives
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    Categories
    • News
    Meta
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
    Tiatra LLC.

    Tiatra, LLC, based in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, proudly serves federal government agencies, organizations that work with the government and other commercial businesses and organizations. Tiatra specializes in a broad range of information technology (IT) development and management services incorporating solid engineering, attention to client needs, and meeting or exceeding any security parameters required. Our small yet innovative company is structured with a full complement of the necessary technical experts, working with hands-on management, to provide a high level of service and competitive pricing for your systems and engineering requirements.

    Find us on:

    FacebookTwitterLinkedin

    Submitclear

    Tiatra, LLC
    Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.